Skip Navigation

Why do people say more people didnt vote for trump than did?

and why doesn't everybody vote? I don't understand why it isn't mandatory i think everyone should have to, men, women, and children. If you can read the ballot, you should be able to vote. I know my nephew wouldn't have voted for trump and he's 10!

24 comments
  • Statistics can be interpreted differently. The following numbers are all rounded back of the envelope math: approximately 77 million people voted for Trump. About 74 million for Harris. Combined they are about 151 million and they represent about 64% of all people who could've cast a ballot. So 100% is about 236 million people eligible to vote. So 236m-151m=85 million didn't bother. You could add this to either total for the candidates and say the majority didn't vote for the opponent. Because not casting their ballot for whatever reason can also be seen as voicing an opinion. It's a bit of statistical gymnastics if you want to make a point, albeit not a good one.

    Making the vote mandatory is a philosophical question. In Australia it is mandatory. But in most countries that have elections that deserve to be called that it is not. If you interpret freedom to mean you're also free not to go and vote you cannot make it mandatory. I agree with you that everyone who is eligible should go and vote. But I also believe the choice should be up to the individual. So we should find ways to motivate eligible voters to make use of their (fixed typo) right. With regards to children I'm not sure it's a great idea. If they're very young they may just double the tally that their parents add to. In Europe, some countries lowered the age in some elections to 16, which I think is okay. But I wouldn't go lower than that.

  • I keep up with US news for years by now and I'm some French dude who shouldn't care about it. The US is a preview of the next issues my country will encounter so I think it matters to follow some American news.

    I think it doesn't matter really why American elected Trump twice. It just raises the question on what can we do to change that. And there is nothing else really to do that trying to reach out and convince the other side.

    My main philosophical question out of this is what can you do if your country decides unequivocally and democratically to be racist or Xenophobic or commiting war crimes?

    It also doesn't really matter as to why a large group of human beings can agree to be racist but I think it definitely says something about humanity. In some way it makes climate change more "acceptable" in my mind. Maybe we do deserve to go extinct if after all this progress and intellectual collaboration all we get is deciding to become racist or discriminatory, to morally fail, to prey on the weak and powerless.

    That's how bad the US looks for me right now. It's depressing in general about us humans and not just America. It's a testament to our ability to be evil and to collaborate to be evil or mean to others.

    We usually get one or two people saying to look for the helpers in time of crisis. There is no helper for this crisis. Good luck living in a dictatorship I guess.

24 comments