Skip Navigation

This a new one: Banned for abbreviating New York Times to NYT in a comment.

https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/29191692

I don't even know what to think about this one. I'm not angry, more confused than anything. There's only one mod there so i asked them, and they said "It's against policy. It's the abbreviations policy."

I see no such policy anywhere, so who knows what's going on. Is it only the NYT that can't be abbreviated? What about the US? Is LOL forbidden too? And if so, why are we forbidden from laughing there!

They didn't even remove the comment.
The mod is user qrstuv. Maybe the only abbreviation allowed is when they say one? That's a power trip!

238 comments
  • Thank you for informing me, as someone who tends to use acronyms quite frequently (usually adding the meaning in parenthesis for the first instance), I've gone ahead and blocked that community. I have zero interest in a news community that is enforcing rules that they are not publicly displaying, especially ones that don't go under "common sense" principles.

  • This person is a PTB for sure, I mean seriously? Banning people for abbreviations? That's outright petty. This person strikes me as one of the biggest losers I've seen on here in a while.

    Oh and before some whiny asshole who's probably an alt of the mod comes here whining about how they're allowed to make whatever rules they want, they didn't actually. I mean make any rule about it. The sidebar of their community literally says:

     
        
    News Stories
    
    
      

    So this person is a power tripper because they are banning people for something that isn't actually a rule, nor is it a common decency violation. It's just purely and simply banning for spite.

    • I've straight blocked that News channel for this reason for some time. If the content is going to be filtered through the hands of mods this obnoxious, its not worth following.

  • Make up bullshit reasons when people post from or about a certain thing, and people will only think you are nutty instead of actively suppressing content. The fun benefit of doing this is that you can even do it when a community has more members of the type you want to suppress, you just do it occasionally and statistics slowly allow the content to be herded to where you are leading it. Troll factories love this one trick, as it is indistinguishable from actual power tripping mods.

    • A very common technique back on Reddit. The political subs loved to ban for petty or "humorous" reasons whenever a particular account got too popular. I remember /r/Libertarian banning an account for having too much accumulated karma. /r/neoliberal had all sorts of "joke" moderation rules they referenced to as posting monetary policy. It was all childish bullshit intended to filter who participated and narrow content down to whatever mods preferred.

  • They've locked every post so I guess they don't really want any community whatsoever.

  • Sounds like crazy-making with the way they've got you questioning the obvious... does the sun really rise in the east, will it really hurt if I jump off this bridge, can fish really survive under water 🤪

  • YTB? Yeah. Probably. But please ffs read all of this: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/29759609

    They posted this. There is a lot of weird context to SDF, and dogpiling on a specific self criticizing satirical post is not ok.

    • I don't really know what the point of sharing that here was, because your comments in that thread do not help resolve this issue at all.

      I'll respond specifically to this comment:

      Once again. This community under which you are replying is fucking satire most of the time, unless @wesker@lemmy.sdf.org is feeling frisky. Are you deliberately being obtuse here? I beyond guarantee that any kind of attention outside of SDF was never wanted or warranted - it was accidental. Please take it to that thread on db0.

      Your comments throughout that thread were very unclear as to whether you were talking about the SDF instance as a whole or !modabuse@lemmy.sdf.org (a problem caused, in part, by Lemmy's use of the general noun community for its proper noun Communities). Frankly, even now I'm still only like 70% sure you meant the latter. So I think it's incredibly rude of you to accuse @donuts@lemmy.world of being obtuse.

      But anyway, even putting that aside, I fail to see how any of your points make things better. You keep harping on about how scribbled time stamps make it obviously satire. I saw that and presumed it was put in there to help the reader keep track of how much time was passing over this conversation. Frankly, if you wanted to point out that the post was obvious satire, concentrating on the body text would have been better evidence.

      I waited so long to come forward and tell my story because I didn’t think anyone would believe me. But now I want people to know what happened to me, because if knowing what happened to me could prevent it happening to them, then I want them to know.

      But all that is is evidence that they're poking fun at something. Not necessarily that it's at themselves as an admission of guilt. If they were in this thread or pinning a post in their Community explaining "hey, I fucked up", and then following up with a meme post about their fuck-up, sure, it'd be clear. But as it is, it's just as possible to read it as them laughing at their victims.

      But I come back to the question of why did you link that thread here? Nobody in this thread was discussing that, and even if the dog pile in that Community was not warranted, the dog pile on their actions in the non-satire News community, and their terrible behaviour in the DMs with @TachyonTele@lemm.ee, are still highly worthy of criticism. And will remain worthy of criticism until such a time as they publicly and explicitly admit culpability and promise to moderate in good faith via reasonable and clear criteria going forward, or they are removed by their instance admins and replaced by someone who will.

      Or, if that news Community is supposed to be some weird experimental artsy space...there needs to be somewhere people can be pointed to in order to explain that. Not necessarily in the Community itself, but something somewhere, even if that's just a bunch of people (not just the one person making dozens of comments that exist without corroboration) who are in on it being able to come in and explain it.

    • So they're incredibly immature? Gotcha.

238 comments