They want us to be silent.

At least name the rep. There’s plenty of us here who would gladly call them.
- It really does seem like they are just trying to click bait when they pretend to not want to name the Employer

The definition of fascism is the marriage of corporation and state
Benito Mussolini
This is part of what true fascism looks like
- It's looked that way for a long time, we just can't play pretend, anymore. And for those who keep trotting out the "told you so," we told you the Dems needed to stop playing pretend and get serious with serious candidates, rather than slightly less fascist fascists.
- Yeah, well, what does that guy know about fascism?
  
  I thought he was mostly remembered for his diet plans.
- Corporation in the sense he's using it is muddled, but what this is describing is accurate to what he meant. He meant that industry should be run by cooperative alliances that are under the fascist state. Like most fascists, he was always shifting what he meant by corporatism based on whatever rhetorical expediant that was most useful at the time. Corporatism sounds good but in principle it doesn't describe how exactly you form the corporations and how they govern themselves. It's accurate in the sense that this is an example of what he desired in using state power to always be a boot over any cooperative.
  See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism to understand it's essentially a theory to contrast itself with Marxisim without actually describing specifics so it has wildly different interpretations that basically boil down to "let's get together and do what's best for everybody." Who knows how to draw the rest of the owl though.
- Corporations are dictatorships so that tracks

We warned the people who sat home on election day about project 2025 and yet they covered their ears and enabled all of this.
- I was told by a coworker, just after election day, that Project 2025 was just propaganda, and that "Democrats have their own propaganda too you know..."
  Shit left me speechless. I was just like, let's revisit this conversation in three months.
- And Democrats were warned that they need to stop putting their thumbs on the scale to push the most dog shit candidates that don't promise anything that will help the working class. Fascism happens when democracy is unresponsive to the needs of the working class, and for the last 50 years Democrats have just been great at finding excuses for why they can't do something. Do you think Trump will listen to the parliamentarian if they disagree with something?
  Fuck, Democrats have even been voting for his cabinet picks, despite claiming Trump is a fascist. They all voted to confirm Marco Rubio.
  
  Democrats were warned
  So, the litmus test of this logic is this: Do we blame the opposition for the Nazi party? Should we start doing that too after 80 years?
  
  The division is the point
  
  And voters were warned with years of inaction that they needed to start being more engaged.
  The reason we have so many shit candidates is because people don't show up for the real ones.
  
  Democrats fielded someone who wasn't a criminal IN A BINARY CHOICE.
  It's baffling how stupid people are. Just vote for the person who isn't a rapist bent on destroying the country. Like "see the man-child who can't keep his hands to himself? Vote for the candidate who isn't him."
  Stop whining that Dems didn't field mother Theresa.
  
  We need to move forward and this histrionic blathering is a distraction.
- I understand you're hurt and concerned right now, with good reason. That said, to get out of this we need to be objective about how we got here.
  Blaming our current situation just on people who didn't vote is not taking into account the whole picture. Yes, if non voters had shown up at the polls and voted Harris then Trump wouldn't have won. Also if people who voted for Trump had not shown up, then Harris would have won. If people who voted Trump had voted Harris, she would have won. So?
  WHY do people act the way they do? Because of the candidates. Because of the parties. Because of the information they encounter. Because of the entrenched interests that have created a low quality of life, and led people to believe that nothing will change, and that they can't trust what "elites" say.
  Does that make the current situation any better? No. But it at least hints at possible avenues to go down, ways things could be improved. Saying "we told them, but they didn't listen" implies there's not much action that can be taken, just relaying information beforehand, and scolding after.

we have a government agency to help with that sort of thing.
oh. right. had.

I know some illegal recourses, and if they try to illegally destroy American lives then turnabout is fair play.
- Every fascist act is carried out by just a mere human. Same old problems have the same old solutions.
  
  FAFO

Sounds like tortious interference to me.

Don't work for fascists.
- It's not fair that they just forced their way into a position that they didn't have before.

This is a good opportunity to remind people to search yourself on the major search engines and take whatever steps necessary to remove your online presence.
- My last name is such a common word, I don't pop up on anything.
  
  Yeah I share a name with a famous comedian so it would be really hard to find me.

I'm not saying this couldn't happen, but this justdoesn't ring super true to me. How would the user know who the "identified individual" was, how they found the husband's information, or who they called (the "friend") at his company that's apparently in control of his employment? That's a lot of convenient coincidences that, even of they are true, would hardly be easily accessible information to make such a confident accusation.
- It doesn't ring true because of the vagueness of the post.
- If the employer is an University or something like that in a smaller state, and they called specifically about a policy change or something happening at the department of education, it could be relatively easy to happen, especially if they gave their name when calling the representative (which I guess you would).
  
  That's a lot of assumptions.