Firefox uninstalled itself :|
Firefox the flatpak version crashed and decided to remove itself from the system, is this common on Linux??
I checked thru Discover and terminal using whereis firefox and all I got is user/lib64/firefox
I should be mad, but I find this too hilarious to be mad.. lol.. files disappear not entire apps
No, because it doesn't happen. Guaranteed your storage device or some other hardware component is having problems that is corrupting your drive.
It's new hardware, and this is a fresh install.. still.. you could be right
Be honest. What did you say that offended Firefox so bad it decided to leave?
That he prefers Edge's mother's cooking.
I too prefer to edge over his mom cooking
When the questions you ask chatGPT even offend the browser you're using!
Did it really uninstall itself? Run this command and check whether you can see Firefox's ID or not:
flatpak list
If firefox is still in /usr/lib64/firefox, then it should still be there. Maybe just the .desktop file is removed?
OP mentioned that it was the Flatpak version, which doesnt add anything to root owned parts of the filesystem.
More than likely it was a failed package transition that failed. You were running one version, an update triggered, something went wrong, and your data folders got orphaned. You can try running a repair on the package, but they usually fail the same way.
Does this mean everytime there's an update, Firefox will get uninstalled? .. That's a serious flaw
Anytime there is an update, files are often deleted during that process so they can be replaced with new files or because those files are no longer part of the new version being installed. If an error occurs during this process, it is possible that an application will appear not to be installed because it's broken.
Anyway, most software does at least partially "uninstall" when it is updating, so if the install fails, then it's always possible that an update will have uninstalled something. That's just updates regardless of operating systems, package managers, etc.
what distro?
Fedora 41
Damn, that's tough. Have you heard about our lord and savior Ubuntu and it's blessed snap version of Firefox?
🤣
It's blessed so hard, it'll snap itself out of your system resources, giving you more RAM.. Amen
It's... weird, did you do something that accidentally deleted firefox?
I removed the preinstalled version, and installed the Flatpak version because it's more up to date, then i Installed Portmaster.. That's about it
I don’t have any advice for this exact problem but if it’s any consolation Firefox has randomly gotten offended at my video drivers and bricked my build. Multiple times. I use Librewolf when I can now.
That is hilarious though, sending frustrated IT vibes your way in both empathy and hopes it’ll help you reach the critical mass of superstition for the problem to fix itself before you have to threaten to take a hammer to it.
Firefox is still extremely messy on Linux. It’s split between multiple platform types (flatpak, deb, snap) and I’ve seen multiple parts start to branch off on their own due to some fault. It’s really weird. Can’t even describe it. Why can’t they just do things simply.
As someone formerly involved in security at the enterprise OS development scope, I consider one less Flatpak to be an improvement in security and consistency.
Well done!
I would be interested in knowing why. Isn't the sandboxing supposed to make security better?
wow, really? That contradicts everything i heard about Flatpaks
people say this all the time but the reasons they give are always nonsense in my experience, sandboxing alone makes flatpak better
It would be nice if @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca clarified
i avoid using flatpaks if i can. recently had to migrate mine from the root partition to home partition cuz they had filled my root partition space.
And that's why I don't use flatpaks. Nothing like that has ever happened to me.
I use Flatpaks because they're supposedly more sandboxed thus more secure, especially in something that is exposed to the Internet like a web browser, I need all the sandboxing I can get..
I wish it doesn't happen again, because I spent 2 hours tweaking Firefox, importing data to my extensions and some of them I have to configure manually..
Actually, in the case of a web browser, Flatpak weakens both Firefox's and Chromium's internal sandboxing, possibly allowing for breaking of cross-site or site-host boundaries. Firefox is even weaker then Chromium as a Flatpak because it can't use the zypak fork server. Both are weakened, best to avoid.
For basically any other app, Flatpak can be beneficial as a sandbox.
Basically, don't sandbox browsers because its like wearing 2 condoms. The only sandboxing tool I know that doesn't interfere with the browser's sandbox (and also doesnt allow for the possibility of privilege escalation, like Firejail) is Bubblejail
PS: Since you mentioned you are on Fedora, Bubblejail is offered through this COPR repo from the Secureblue team. It provides a sandbox without interfering with the browser's sandbox. It comes with profiles for Firefox and Chromium. Only issue ive experienced is that the sandbox works, aka it means I can't access files from my home directory unless explicitly given permission to a folder.
You still have the binary then. Type firefox into the terminal.
It says: bash: firefox: command not found...
Install package 'firefox' to provide command 'firefox'? [N/y]
What this person told you was wrong, you need to use flatpak run [package id] to run flatpak apps. You can do flatpak list to see all installed flatpaks with their ids. An id looks something like org.example.app and you'd run it with flatpak run org.example.app.
Also, is it shown as being installed in Discover? If it's not you could try just installing it again and if it is, you can try uninstalling it first. The user data for Firefox should stay intact.
its flatpak run org.mozilla.firefox
