Skip Navigation

How rare is it for people to live without anger?

When I look at the kinds of articles people post on social media and the comments under them, it feels like there’s an overwhelming amount of hate and anger in the world - or at least among the people posting and commenting. (Maybe it’s just that non-angry people don’t spend much time in this kind of spaces.)

In contrast, when I think about my own life, I realize that I’m almost never angry. I feel many other negative emotions, sure, but anger isn’t one of them, and even when it arises it's usually quite short-lived. I can’t even name a single person I hate - neither in my personal life nor in the media. I simply don’t spend time dwelling on people I’m not interested in or being angry at the world for not meeting my expectations.

This makes me wonder: is my experience rare or unusual? Or is hate and anger simply overrepresented in the media because those emotions motivate people to engage, making them seem far more widespread than they actually are?

I'm trying to understand rather than criticize. I can't take credit for not being angry because whatever tha skill is doesn't translate into other things like anxiety. I'm anxious about equally trivial things and I can't help myself. I guess I'm just glad I don't need to deal with this constant anger too.

52 comments
  • Anger and hate are not the same. Anger can be a healthy emotion to signal your (personal) boundaries. Not feeling hate is admirable and I think it's entirely possible, sure.

    • I'd argue that hating concepts can lead to productive societal growth, and could even lead to personal growth depending on what is hated and for what reason.

      For example, I hate capitalism, corruption, greed etc., which led me to learn more about alternatives that I would have not learned about otherwise. This could also go both ways, though, since hate for the exact same things have also led people down a fascist road, as human nature makes it so that we always want an enemy to blame. Whether that enemy is the ultra-wealthy or whether it's the common man (ex: trans people, women, immigrants, etc.) is largely dictated by the media they consume and the people they surround themselves with.

      Mob mentality is alive and well, and it's up to all of us (as non-billionaires) to focus that energy in the correct places. Billionaires are the ones who started the culture war and keep feeding it, since that distracts normal people away from themselves, since they know that if they didn't give the masses a group to hate (the common man), that they would find their own group to hate (billiomaires).

      There's a reason Luigi has so much support even though he allegedly murdered someone.

      Economic instability will always lead to resentment over something and/or someone/group.

  • I'm Autustic and don't seem to have anger. "Frustrated" is similar, I got that one just fine, but anger doesn't seem to come up. I don't seem to have a bunch of them, though. So, I have definitely noticed the same thing. The internet is so full of anger, and it mostly just seems to serve to temporarily compromise the intellect of the person feeling it, so it makes them sound dumber at a time when they probably wish they were coming across as clever.

    Dumber, but also more sure of themselves. There is a reason people usually come back half an hour later and apologize for what they did when they were angry. It does have its uses, but open communication can also preclude it. For people who don't tend to communicate freely, anger can help them finally say something they haven't been saying. And quite a few people seem to work that way. Finally saying the thing they haven't been saying can lead to solutions for their problem.

    But anger can also lead to some pretty dumb things, and that seems to be the more common result.

    • I’m also autistic and also don’t really feel anger. I feel disappointed and/or frustrated with how people act, and I can feel a complete lack of goodwill towards people (not my baseline, I generally want to help people if I can). There are certainly people who deserve negative consequences for their actions and I don’t feel any compassion for Assad, for example. I probably wouldn’t piss on him if he were on fire, but I don’t feel angry with him (I might if I were Syrian and/or had more experience with the effects of his actions).

      In my personal life, I don’t have any exes that I’m angry with (and I have some awful exes), it’s either confused, afraid of, pitying, neutral or positive.

      Though tbh, I’m not sure if I just don’t recognize anger but do feel it. A coworker was sketchy about a tip we should have shared the other day, and I felt that it was wrong she pretended she hadn’t gotten a tip, and sad for her that she’d be deceptive about €0,65, but I wasn’t angry.

      I do feel spiteful sometimes, which has got to be similar, but the only way I really express that is being extra polite to someone who’s being a dick so they feel guilty. It feels to me like I do that because I want them to be less rude in the future and I want to help induce the natural consequence of guilt that comes along with rudeness, but that could also just be my rationalizing it.

  • I believe that our media are actively stoking outrage and shock.

    People have a built-in tendency to pay more attention to danger than opportunity: if you fail to notice some berries on a bush you won’t necessarily die but if you fail to notice a scorpion on the path you may very well die. So people react strongly to negative information.

    This strong reaction registers as “engagement” and media think they must be offering info that people want. In the digital age, engagement can be counted and tracked, which allows you to quickly adapt and do more of whatever creates that engagement.

    We’ve been experiencing that optimization loop for the last 20 years and it is now at a deafening roar. We don’t have problems in the world, we have existential crises. We don’t have political disagreements, we have mortal enemies. We don’t have a venal buffoon for a president, we have a fascist dictator murdering rapist psychopath.

    This isn’t the only factor but it is significant and it is also new. Yes, there has been sensationalism in the last but it is new to be able to track media consumption like this and adapt on the fly, automatically. It’s taken us to a whole new level.

  • While I was going through my posts on Twitter and deleting them all, I noticed that nearly all of the were gripes or complaints about something during my day. That's not to say I had a lot of bad days but I'd be more likely to want to vent them than just vibing through the good days in social media silence. Each person is very different, but unless I was in a space where socializing was a daily thing, my tendency was to be more negative than positive Most of the time.

  • I don't live with anger nor hate. I understand logically that all the subjects that frustate me are not changeable because of human nature. Like Politics for example, it frustates me the way every politician is always a little corrupt (or a lot sometimes) for some subject, but I understand that it's not only about that one person, it's also about human nature to want money and power and there is no way to change it, unless we put an alien or an AI in charge.

  • I'd say it's relatively rare.

    The ability to feel anger, but not dwell on it, takes practice. Anger is partially chemical, hormonal. So you can't eliminate it entirely. The best we can do is work towards a set of anger related goals.

    First, there's the skill of noticing anger in its very earliest start, so that you can prevent it from being enough to take concentration to control. That's what stuff like mindfulness, meditation, and the like help with the most regarding anger. They give you the tools (eventually) to default to a more observant state, where you'll notice the beginnings of anger and use mechanisms to divert it.

    That makes anger management much easier because a lot of what gets people into trouble with anger is how long it takes for that rush you dissipate once it gets going. So you can apply anger management techniques to accelerate that cycle reaching its end.

    That makes it more likely that you'll resist any actions that might be spurred by anger until you can choose to make them if they're useful and appropriate.

    Pretty much all of our emotions are at least partly chemical. I'm not aware of any that aren't, but I'm hesitant to say it's all of them period. Some emotions are harder to resist than others, but not all of those chemicals are equal. Adrenaline, for example, is there to bypass conscious thought and control and spur us into action of some kind, even if that action is seemingly passive (like freezing up). Yeah, it's more complicated than that, but we don't need to cover every inch in this kind of chat.

    But, and this is the key to successfully managing one's anger, you have to be willing to recognise that feeling anger is neither uncontrollable, nor a reason to act on that anger. It's a response to stimuli, but it also isn't something someone else makes us feel. We can mitigate our responses when angry, and (no matter how much another person is intentionally trying to make it happen) it is an internal process.

    The problem is that it's a shit ton of work, and the learning curve is not a gentle one. It also is harder to work that curve the more reasons you have to be angry.

  • I'm kind of similar. I can't think of the last time I got angry. I've never been red faced angry since maybe I was a kid.

    Also don't know anyone I would say I hate. Trump is close maybe. I'd verbally say "I hate him" but in reality he doesn't get much real emotional rise out of me except extreme disappointment and disgust.

    "Hate" seems reserved for someone I have strong emotions toward. Strong enough I might want to do something violent about it. Nobody fits that bill.

    I suspect we might be talking across a deep valley with the people that have anger issues. Neither can really understand the other.

  • I don't feel anger very often (and it's very quick to vanish) and hate is extremely hard-won, but I have C-PTSD from childhood abuse and neglect. So I'm not your average person.

  • Start from the perspective that there is a huge machine out there that is monetarily driven to attract views, name whichever business sector you want, but it’s probably going to be something to do with media.

    The most successful ways to get views are fear and anger.

    Now couple that with people that want fake internet points, get real money, or want to drive you to a place for someone else to make money, and they’re also going to post fear and anger.

    Of course this type of information incites some really strong feelings. Couple this with people doing the same with literal lies, distorted and incomplete facts, and even plain old bad spelling, all designed to drive interaction and views, and now you get an internet spammed with hate and anger.

    Fear and anger sell like crazy. And everyone wanting a view or a click are posting it everywhere to drive interaction in order to profit in some way.

    So I would say that yes, the take you have about this stuff being overrepresented is correct. It’s deliberately overrepresented for engagement reasons.

52 comments