Take the computer from a real artist, they can still make art. Do the same to an AI "artist" and see how long they keep claiming to be such.
Source (Bluesky)
You're viewing a single thread.
Talks about real art being unique and then goes and draws the most generic, cliched furry shit that looks exactly like a million others.
That. And the famous equation rendering == art. Like, raw art? not art! Naive art? Not art! Performance ?not art.
Is performing not rendering? Wtf is "raw art"? And being naive doesn't stop you from rendering. None of your examples make any sense.
My bad, raw art was a crude translation from my language. Wikipedia tell me you call it outsider art. And naive art is pretty much define by a lack of rendering techniques.
No worries, I didn't realize there was a language barrier. Sorry.
