It's a piece of media that's critical of a fascist regime, and the person who says it's fake is a .ml
if they ever answer, it'll be dismissive about how all western media is biased against china/nk/Russia. That's as close to an explanation of "why it's fake" as you'll get.
You should always be critical of any media that doesn't have a concrete source though. I don't personally know anything about radiofreeasia, so fuck if I know how reliable they are to begin with.
The service, which provides editorially independent reporting,[6][7][8][9][10][11] has the stated mission of providing accurate and uncensored reporting to countries in Asia that have poor media environments and limited protections for speech and press freedom.
6 references to the Independent reporting part!
Seems pretty OK to me.
If the best RFA-apologia source you can come up with says they "published anti-vaccine misinformation", they're not credible.
6 references to the Independent reporting part! Seems pretty OK to me.
Did you just count the number of sources and call it a day?
The DW source (which @Lumidaub@feddit.org casts doubt on) says "RFA is funded by the US Congress but with a mandate of editorial independence."
The Washington Post source fails verification – it does not mention anything about editorial independence
The Atlantic source just says "The Daily was not the only organization targeted. Radio stations broadcasting Radio Free Asia and Voice of America, U.S.-backed services that provide independent news to many rural Cambodians, were shuttered, as was the U.S.-funded National Democratic Institute."
I can't get the immigration journal article
The Hill source mentions that Joe Biden (the President of the USA) had the authority to dismiss the CEO, i.e. they are not independent of the state
the Vox source is the clearest: it says that the reason these "editorial independence" claims are popping up (in spite of politicians firing CEOs) is coz of the International Broadcasting Act of 1994 PDF, which I suppose refers to Section 305(18)(d)
Anyway RFA have a long-standing awful reputation, CIA links, and the hot-dog story is implausible on the face of it. You're making me do a lot of work to debunk fairly obvious misinformation.
I don't know why you're trying to claim this is fake, Radio Free Asia is a credible source, and North Korea is ruled by a brutal and insane dictator. This is a credible news story, and it stays.
For the record, "arguing in favor of a fascist regime" also appears to mean questioning if this article is actually true. Admittedly, they didn't do the best job.
Given the originating article was actually from The Sun, a right-wing tabloid, I'm a little skeptical. The Radio Free Asia bit was in reference to a November 2024 article about the crackdown on the other mentioned dishes. Not coming from a tabloid, I'm much less skeptical there.
Also for the record, I commented once in a .ml "Fuck Cars" post. Looking forward to seeing if browsing by all makes me a pro-fascist North Korean supporter.
Questioning the story is fine. Brigading isn't, and failing to actually attack the credibility of the reporting isn't.
Yes, the origin of the story is the Sun, but until there's a reason not to trust it, the fact-checking by other, less tabloid-y outlets that have also carried the story seems trustworthy.
The story is also well within the norm for the behavior of the North Korean dictatorship.
Do you have an actual reason to suspect the story is false? Post it here. I won't delete it if you credibly back your claims up.
Other forms of cooking are fine, but boiling hot dogs should be illegal everywhere (grilling is where it’s at, baby). Regardless, calling it treason is a bit much, and pretty weird.
This is kind of amazing, I was actually, genuinely interested in what the people calling the story "fake" had to say because it's obviously pretty out there and I have no prior knowledge about the source. Everything I got in response to asking for more information was utter dumbfuckery. Also straight up lies about what I said. Good job with the propaganda, Genossen.