I'll get there one day.

Obviously communism doesn't work, that's why America spends trillions of dollars squashing communist countries and installing loyal regimes :)
- Or maybe because we were both trying to put nuclear weapons in friendly countries close to each other's borders
- Obviously communism works. That's why every communist country tries their hardest to stop people from leaving NK.
  
  Nothing says "classless" like the Kim Dynasty.
  
  I don't have a comeback as good as @explodicle@local106.com's, so I'll just wait patiently for your response.

Did I mention I love living in a European country, where education and healthcare is free?
- That's not socialism, that's a country with social services. I've seen multiple time when people from Scandinavia were offended when their country was called "socialist" - they are not. The economy is capitalist but the country offers strong social services.
  Another funny thing - when reading about the us you realizer that it's just a broken market and snowballed problems. For example - the government invests more than any other country (per capita) in the health sector. The thing is it got out of hand.
  
  It's a broken market because it's a rigged market. For all my endless harping, I don't think capitalism is pure evil. I think crony capitalism, and I believe that is what it means when we talk about "late stage capitalism," certain winners are allowed to buy the rule makers, which concentrates wealth, which allows more spending on rule makers, etc etc.
  If we had guardrails, capitalism could do what it's supposed to - See a need/want, meet that need/want, make a reasonable amount of money which gets spent on other needs/wants.
  
  I remember watching an economic professor saying that we will never achieve pure capitalism because it's just to measure how far we are into the capitalism. Maybe that also goes with socialism.
- Yeah I don't want socialism
  I just want the services that every human being needs to be socialised
  Plenty of non socialist countries have socialised services
  
  They export the misery to the global south instead

When trying to achieve equality, it takes far less work to drag one group down than to lift another group up to an equal level.
This is the crux of why Communism typically achieved worse outcomes than other systems.
- Yes, eliminating hyper greed will result is less hoarded wealth. So uh yeah, one guy won't own 7 mansions.
  
  Yeah, that's the part that hasn't happened historically. Usually it turns into eat the middle class.
- The uh...
  The fucking Evergrande thing. They Ponzi schemed the whole real estate market.
  There is now more housing in China than there is demand, yet houses still cost money.
  Because they want housing to be profitable to investors.
  Maybe stuff that people need to live shouldn't always be a for-profit endeavour?
- I would add the religious reverence for Marx so many Communist societies had.
  Marx was excellent at analyzing the problem. But his ideas how to solve it were bad.
  Most Communist countries stuck to ideological purity to an extreme and never tried different approaches.
- Communism isn't about equality though.
  And I wouldn't say communism achieved worse outcomes. Countries adopting some form of communist ideology experienced some of the most rapid increases in industrialization, QoL, and education. They weren't perfect, but they definitely didn't drag everyone down to the previous minimum.
  
  Most of the communist regimes people use as examples rose to power at a point in history when new technologies and industrialization were having a huge impact on the way people lived.
  A mix of capitalism and socialism that made a point of educating and upskilling their population would have achieved the same goal without the brutal massacre of a chunk of their population.
  
  One of the big problems with communism is that economic prosperity is framed fundamentally as a zero sum game. When that's a foundational axiom of the system you build you wind up not building systems of growth, only of redistribution. It has rippling effects throughout the culture and the philosophy of a nation that attempts it.
- This is a good point. I agree.