Windows VS Linux

I've never "debloated" Windows so idk about the top half.
The bottom half is accurate. Debian, Fedora, and Mint are easier to install than Windows 10 or 11. Not that Windows is difficult, it's just a bit clunky and idiosyncratic.
I assume Microsoft doesn't care much about the installer since it's generally only used by OEMs, whereas for Linux distros it's a first impression so it has to be polished.
- No excuse though. Try the "install as oem" of Linux Mint. You get an install with temporary oem account, you can update the system, install additional programs, then click "Prepare for shipping to end user" and on next boot you're greeted with a setup screen.
  
  That sounds pretty nice. More installers should have something like that
- Well, if you want accuracy, then no the meme isn't really that accurate.
  On an updated Win11 system the Shift+ F10 command prompt "OOBE\BYPASSNRO" trick still works to setup a new system without Internet (and by extension, without a MS account) so that's like most of the battle right there
  The rest is taken care of with your choice of debloat scripts that are out there
  
  compared to clicking "next" on Fedora, Debian, or Mint
  I'd say using a simple straightforward GUI is much easier than an arcane combination of commands and keypresses
  
  I used AtlasOS on my windows partition. Had to cause for some reason steam streaming was borked and would only black screen. And now I’m too lazy to swap back over to cachyos. Lmao. Waiting to see that bug is fixed.
- I had to install Windows 11 on something a few weeks ago so I decided to do it without an account, it was nowhere near as difficult to do it as this sub would lead you to believe. Pressed a key combination to load up the command prompt then typed in a relatively short command. The GUI restarted and that was it.
  
  Yeh, it's there.
  But Linux installers would straight up ask you. So you don't even need to hit the CLI

Almost everyone using Linux installed it. Almost no one using Windows installed it.
- You don't think that many people build their own Windows PCs? Linux gaming isn't that old in the grand scheme of things, and there's plenty of people who dual boot for various reasons.
  I'd almost be willing to bet that there are more people who've installed Windows on their PC than there are people who've installed Linux from a pure numbers standpoint.
  
  Most gaming PCs are pre built. Boutiques have been a business for decades. And every major PC OEM has a gaming division.pc building is niche.
  
  I build my own systems. And I dont know what y'all are smoking but a typical windows installation has the complexity of opening a jar of pickles. Next next yes and away we go.
  Linux on the other hand..
  Now, if you want to debloat and install without a ms account then yes. But then... Really.... Who does that? (i mean of the typical windows users
  
  and all of those numbers combined will still be less than 5% of users.
- Almost no one using Windows installed it.
  I think Windows installs are really common, at least going off of the size of online gaming communities who generally build their own PCs.
- The latter usually have someone to install it for them.

This sub is delusional
- Like every linux community. Living in a bubble that doesn't exist.
- Why?
  
  Installing any operating system is often a hassle. This comes in part from my own experience trying to understand the unguided partition recommendations of a Bazzite (basically Fedora on low level) install. I got through it, but it was certainly no easier than Windows.
- This community (we're not that other site) has just delved into "windows bad" to the point of nauseating.
  Probably going to filter this now especially after that idiotic chart that showed windows 8 being better than 10 with Linux having absolutely no problems whatsoever
- debian should be a bit higher on that list, but it's still easier than installing windows.
- Why? I use Mac mostly, but recently built a PC. I installed two Linux distros on it without even worrying about what drivers I needed, and I even have an NVidia GPU.
  I also created a Windows partition and neither WiFi nor Bluetooth worked out of the box. Linux was objectively easier.
  
  Man, I spent like six hours getting my network drivers sorted out on my last debian install, and I could never get them working on mint. Clearly, my experience shows that linux must be fucking impossible to install. /s
  Yes, mint is a huge leap forward. No longer will my mother be calling me up at four in the morning in tears, asking why tar -xv isn't working to extract her crochet pattern archive. Nor will I have to have friends drive over to my house with a USB drive so I can give them a properly formatted bootable, or have to help my nephew build out a custom ubuntu server image for the r810 he wants to runs his minecraft server on. Now, we have one powerful solution! Anyone can run it, it's got a nice UI! There's uniform tools to manage deployment and user accounts across your entire IT infrastructure! Plug it in and it just... Works....
  Wait.
  Wait shit that's just windows.
  I use linux every day, and mint really truly is a very good choice of OS for the average consumer. But the reasons it is a good choice for the average consumer (ease of maintenance, ease of install, compatibility, community) are all the same reasons windows is a good choice for the average consumer (ignoring privacy and FOSS philosophy, because holy shit does the average consumer not give a shit). Windows can be a pain in the ass, yes. "DLL hell" is a term for a reason. But linux can be equally awful to deal with when it breaks, especially for an inexperienced or non-tech-savvy user.
  This sub can get really up it's own ass about how easy linux is to work with. And, from our perspective, sitting here with our Tux tramp stamps, having used linux for twenty years, it is that easy. But we forget that nothing about computing is intuitive to the average person. This kind of Linux Supremacy bullshit just further entrenches the idea that linux users are all sweaty basement nerds and turns the people that could actually benefit from ditching M$ Home for Mint away from all of us sweaty, arrogant losers.

Mac users:
- Well Mac users do too... Well they don't... but someone does.
  I was that someone for some family members. I felt icky the whole time.
  
  I once upgraded a girl's parents' computer to System 8 and didn't realize it wasn't supported. Fucked up the BIOS (or whatever Macs used back then) and they had to ship it back to Apple to get fixed. I did not hear from her again.
  But I haven't actually installed Mac OS since about Puma. New operating systems just come down in the normal software update. But I still cherish my OS X Beta DVD.
- Where does a Hackintosh fall in?
  
  At the top because you risk going to jail for violating the Apple terms of service/end user license agreement.
  
  The hardest one at all. You have to afford a new computer every 2 years.
- This is also 99% of Windows users

Windows requires pressing next 12 times, what are you people smoking and can I haz?
- There's also a number of things you have to click "no" on, like a free trial office or Onedrive.
  It took me around an hour to set up my new Win 11 laptop, most of which was downloading and installing updates. I expected far worse.
  
  Oh please, we spend an hour fucking around in a new Linux install to get things the way we like them too.
  
  The updates often do take many times the install time which can be a bit frustrating, though it is an area being worked on: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/windows-itpro-blog/introducing-windows-11-checkpoint-cumulative-updates/4182552
  
  And downloading updates is a good thing. Means that the fresh installation isn't vulnerable to something that was fixed between when the USB / DVD was pressed and the time the person installed it.
- See, Ubuntu only requires pressing next 6 times, and Fedora is only 8.
  That's essentially what it boils down to nowadays.
  
  Unless you want tpm backed full disk encryption in which case.... Good luck
  One click for Mac and windows, a lifetime of fun for Linux (except arch w/sysdboot which works pretty good)
- But then you have to wait 45 minutes for Windows update to spin, and potentially hang in the middle
  
  Is it difficult for you to wait?
- With a MS account. Which spies on everything and sells your info.
  
  Use Rufus, skip online account and automatically opt out of telemetry.
  
  Oobe\bypassnro
  Thank me later
  
  I've been asking for several years for anything remotely resembling proof of this.
  Will you be the first person to actually provide it? (I swear to fucking god if you link me to the terms of use....)
  
  What is the very first thing you do after installing the super private and much sekure Linux? You download Steam and give Valve your data. This is bullshit.

would love to see some actual market research on this. sit down a sample of users, have them install then use some OSs. interview them on their experience. rather than yknow making up data
- well people dont actually install OSs
- Even better if made with multiple ussr groups, including tech-savy and people who never installed an os before, as well as people already used to windows and linux.
- i was on a instance called kbin.cafe after fedia.io moved to mbin, for no reason. did it turn into a lemmy instance without redirect?
  
  no i don’t think so, probably just a coincidence. i have never used kbin or mbin
- Not data, It's a meme
  
  the only thing cooler than a meme with fake data is a meme with real data

Biased as fuck lol. Installing windows is not difficult. I did it first time at the age of 8 witn WIndows 98 and their newer installers are made so the general public can do it. And the bloat and spyware? Thats windows dude. Its not meant to be your OS, its meant to spy on your ass at the benefit of being familiar and (relative) easy to use. Anything you do to it post clean install is your own tinkering. Linux distros are great yall, but install difficulty is not a metric I would use to attack windows. Comparing between distros makes sense.
- It can be quite difficult for puzzling reasons. I bought my laptop with no OS because it was cheaper to buy a Windows license separately. I downloaded the ISO and put it on a USB drive and ... It wouldn't boot. It took me half a day and I had to follow guides with various black magic which I can't even recall what was about to finally get the thing to boot from USB. After spending over a day on that, I installed Ubuntu and set up dual booting in about 30 minutes.
- This doesn't say it's difficult, just says there are others which are less difficult. Even if you accept everything at default, windows installs take much longer.
  I'm not sure why you even think this is an attack on windows really. You keep saying windows is for those who want easy to use, so why not include the whole process?
  
  Longer != difficult. Windows installs are easy as fuck and id say its as simple as linux mint.
  The debloating is a choice and id say thats the same amount of work as installing stuff in linux because what it comes with is very limited.
  Im a linux mint user btw
  
  Linux has made leaps and bounds with usability and ease of installation but it's no better than any other modern OS - which is a good thing. Installing Windows from a USB stick is not difficult - the simple path is literally, pick a language, select your wifi, choose who is logging in, click install and go grab a coffee. About the only difficulty if you can call it one is that some installs will ask for a serial number because it's a commercial product.
  Also, the number of questions & buttons during installation is one thing but the certainty of a functioning system is another. Linux is better at supporting old hardware, Windows is better at supporting new hardware. Choose accordingly if that matters.
- I kind of miss the Win98 install process. I did it so many times.. Tried making a Win98 virtual machine, but it just wasn't the same without all the real floppies. The boot disk, the drivers. The JazzJ Jackrabbit shareware. Good times.
- As someone who has tried to install Windows from Linux, and Linux from Windows.... The meme is accurate. Even getting the official Windows ISO on a USB from Linux or MacOS is a multi-hour journey. Want to only install Windows on part of your hard drive? There goes another 15 minutes. Maybe 30 minutes because it wiped your GRUB partition. Honestly, try to do anything but the default options in the Windows install and you'll lose 2 hours.
  Installing Linux? I've installed Arch Linux in under 10 minutes. Manjaro is literally flash ISO to USB using any program (Windows, Linux or Mac) and watch an installer spin for 20 minutes. Windows? You'll be spending 20 minutes on your first "update".
- Linux installs like Ubuntu take about 20 minutes.
  The last time I installed windows 11 (thank God only once) it took me a total of 7 hours divided over 3 days. It was hell, requiring multiple iso downloads, multiple tries to burn a USB with a variety of tools, loads of searching and reading documentation, multiple BIOS settings and a BIOS update, multiple install attempts, searching, downloading and installing drivers, then finally on the winning install it still took like an hour with god knows how many "fuck off and do your job" clicks.
  Mind you, this was on the same machine where right before I installed Linux on a separate M2 device
  Windows installations are a horror show.

Install windows, run debloat powershell script. Done.
Microsoft give no shortage of things to complain about without needing to exaggerate.
- What does debloating entail exactly?
  
  Disabling unnecessary background services, disabling telemetry, removing preinstalled adware. Easy to do with WinUtil by Chris Titus Tech.
- That's literally only the first step.
- The first thing that has actually been useful here. Thanks!
- Or just run Tiny11.

What an absurdly sycophantic graph.

I can agree that installing Arch is easier than installing a debloated Windows. But Gentoo? I spent 2 weeks trying to install it, but couldn't get past partitioning the drive.
- ...paritioning the drives is exactly the same for Arch as it is Gentoo lol if you did it for Arch, why can't you do it for Gentoo?
  
  I meant, I partitioned the drives, but could not complete the steps after that. I couldn't use that tar file to compile the kernel.
  
  I think "couldn't get past partitioning the drive" means they managed to partition the drive but couldn't get beyond it ie couldn't do any more after that.
- I’m genuinely curious as an Arch user. Does gentoo not come with fdisk?
  
  As a Gentoo user who has used Arch in the past, I have no clue what problems this commenter could have run into because paritioning the drives is exactly the same for both distributions... if they were able to figure it out for Arch, then they can do it for Gentoo
  
  Yes it does. And while time-consuming it's actually not too bad if you just follow the guide and don't just skim through it.
  
  Oh, it does: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Installation/Disks
  Look at that manual, isn't it nice?
- man fdisk
- I mean, that you couldn't get past drive partitioning doesn't make it difficult to install for everyone.
  
  But it does make it more difficult relative to the others, which is all that any unitless chart is ever saying.

I don't even know what this graph is even supposed to mean. Bitch about Windows all you like but the installation process is typically very simple.
- There is no X axis so I'm going to assume it means potatoes per guinea pig
- Boot off usb, create partitions, wait, spend five screens clicking 'no' on all of the options, unplug ethernet so it allows you to make a local account, wait, login, spend 15 minutes uninstalling all of the preinstalled nonsense, disable all of the advertising on the task bar and desktop, pretend the rest of the telemetry doesn't exist, download and install the latest drivers from each manufacturers website. Very simple.
  
  Man. Last time I just wanted to check if my new laptop was working properly, so I booted up it's preinstalled Windows. I literally had to look up how to get Windows to get me into Explorer without creating an account or connecting it to my network.
  It took me about 25 minutes and Windows was already installed on the damn thing.
  It took 15 minutes from booting a prepared Fedora stick to logging in.
  I honestly believe that, by now, Linux is no more difficult than Windows. People are just not used to the differences.
  
  You got a point up until you login.
  Afterwards, just run a powershell script that automatically uninstalls the bloat and disables all the stuff you don't want. Takes 30 seconds at most.
  Drivers are automatically installed via Windows update for everything except Nvidia.
- I guess it means that no one here knows what Windows Debloated is and didn't read far down enough to see regular windows marked as very easy to install.
- It has gotten more difficult. I remember windows 7 being just clicking Next until it was done. Win10 requires a signup, clicking no on several telemetry pages with dark patterns, a whole bunch of BS "features".

Installing gentoo

As much as I wish this were true, this is in a bubble where Windows isn't already preinstalled on everything.
- Unfortunatly, that's the reality of how computers are sold. If customers could try out both windows and Ubuntu at the store before buying and then got the variant with that OS preinstalled, I bet more people might use Linux, especially if they saved money by not paying for a windows license.
- It said "(Debloated)" you still have to debloat it even if it's already installed and has enough storage for your liking.
  
  If you actually read the whole graph, you'll see windows has 2 entries.

This is true, but the people who think of Windows as easier to use are not people who install operating systems themselves.
- I install OSes myself and windows is easy.
  
  Windows 11 takes foreeeeeever to install on cutting edge hardware. Arch OTA is literally 4 clicks and fast as fuck.
  
  easier to use
- I've installed over +400 Window machines.
  Windows is definitely easier to use.
  So your statement is factually incorrect.

Um... My grandma installed Windows 11 on her computer and then ran a simple script I gave her after. You guys are delusional.
- Was it a script to install your own crypto miner?
- oh damn that sucks, thats why you dont click suspicious links

I love Debian, but it's installer is shit.
- It's one of the only installers that seems to take the longest compatatively and (afaik) doesn't really let you leave it unaftended. Most other distros let you just set everything first then go, but Debian does that and then asks you what DE and other questions mid install..
- It really is, I can use it, but it's clunky compared to even Arch's TUI. Gentoo is harder, but Gentoo isn't trying to do what Debian is.
  
  Another bad one is Fedora's. I'm used to it, of course, but the placement of the buttons to exit screens is all over the fuck, and you better know what you're doing in order to even set the hostname and make a user during install.
- I've probably used it more than a hundred times now, but I still get confused about the current step sometimes.

Windows 11 without a Microsoft-Account = terminal required. Linux Mint = terminal not required.

Installing regular Windows 10/11 is definitely more than twice as painful than installing Debian 12.
Once, I was trying to install Windows 10 and wasted an entire day! The installation would systematically fail at the beginning of the installation with a BS error message that doesn't give any hint about what's going wrong. In the end it just didn't like USB3 as an installation media! I reflashed it to a USB2 and it worked, but OMG was it super slow ! It took literally hours to install !!!
Debian, even as a noobie, you'll go from flashing your ISO to a booted system within an hour. If you've done it once before, you will get it done in 20 minutes.
- What the hell. I've never seen such an issue. Microsoft is so considerate; they provide us with cool little surprises like that from time to time. ♥️
  
  I've seen it a lot (I do PC builds/repairs as a side gig). I just assume it will cause me grief from the start and keep both USB2 and USB3 sticks handy.
  To be fair I've had the issue with Unraid too, but only on one brand's B450 motherboards in my testing. I didn't have a whole bunch to try of course but MSI and Asus was fine, Gigabyte not. X570 didn't have this problem in my experience.
- It works over USB 3.0, it sounds like you just have a broken or corrupt drive.
  
  It normal does work with USB3, yes. And no, this pendrive works perfectly fine and I've used it to install many other OSes since.
  Edit: and I might add that I finally found the solution online so I was definitely not the only one confronted to this problem

Installing windows takes stupidly long. You have to click through 60 pages and click "No, i don't want to share my data" just for them to collect it anyway
- I'm pretty sure it's less than 10, and I just recently set up a Windows machine.
- Who installs an unmodified installer package? That's just silly. Setup your installer using Rufus or something similar and this is not an issue.
- Installing a debloated Windows takes 15 minutes if you know what you are doing.
  The only thing you need to wait on is installing updates.
- Really? Never installed win11 but I remember win10 installs being similarly straightforward to e.g. a calamares install or something like that.

brother, 99% of users will never even consider installing their own os. the issue isn't that Linux is hard to install, the issue is that pretty much anyone brave enough to even mess with their operating system is either already on Linux, a boomer, or trapped by professional software that isn't available on Linux (that's me, a videographer)
the only way Linux is breaking out of extreme obscurity is if it starts coming pre-installed on commercially available and desirable hardware. the steam deck did more for Linux in a single product launch than the entire decade of combined efforts before that. before the deck i would have said it was simply never going to happen, but who knows. maybe it'll be up to eccentric billionaires that never went public with their companies to push the Linux future we all want.
- The Steak Deck motivated me to finally make the jump to Linux. Until people can buy a Linux PC at the local electronics store, Linux will always be in a niche. And that's not happening any time soon because of anti-competitive practices by Microsoft.

Why do all my homies use Linux Mint while I use Ubuntu?
- Because you're wrong?
  Personally I don't like snaps, is the main thing.
  
  I don't like Snaps either, but it isn't a that big of a deal. Ubuntu is still vastly more private than Windows. I do prefer Fedora much more because it actually sandboxes system services with SELinux polices. Snap creates a better sandbox for applications than Flatpak, but it is slower to launch applications, depends on AppArmor (which is less secure than SELinux), and uses hard coded package repo (centralized design).
  
  What are snaps?
- They might simply like Mint's Cinnamon over Ubuntu's GNOME. That's a valid choice.
  
  Cinnamon with Wayland is still in testing. X11/X.Org is unmaintained software and is less secure than Wayland. GNOME is the only desktop at the moment that actually protects the screen from arbitrary recording by applications. Just food for thought.
- I'm going to switch to Mint from Ubuntu because I don't trust Canonical, I would rather have the community controlling the distribution.
  
  Interesting. I will Google "what is canonical"
- Snap is hot garbage, and Mint is Ubuntu without Snap, so much better.
- Cinnamon is nice. But then I meet KDE...
  Honestly, if you're happy with Ubuntu, don't worry about what other people think. A lot of the (valid) complains of Ubuntu require research to understand why to be outraged.
  I personally only use immutable now (bazite, aurora and steam OS) and I wouldn't have it any other way now.

With archinstall script you can install Arch in less than 1 minutes (not counting copying system files)
- I installed it following a guide where it had me doing my own partitions and encryption using LUKS in around 30 minutes.

Okay I’m a big supporter of Linux but this is misinformation.
Windows 11 LTSC install was the easiest install I’ve ever done, even easier than mint (or as easy).
The image I used even asked me the username when I was creating the bootable usb so I would save some time.
It also let me opt out of data collection and the rest of the bloatware.
Came with office and it was pre activated.
Now, if only that’s what Microsoft offered their mainstream consumer…
Edit: I don’t understand the downvotes. My last sentence does point out that Microsoft doesnt intentionally make it easier but imo we shouldn’t circle jerk by just claiming things that can easily be false.
- The last Windows I installed was Windows 10. I was trying to install onto a SATA SSD, while keeping my pre-existing Linux installation on the M.2 SSD intact. This took me an unreasonably long time and lots of failed attempts, and in the end, the only way I could find to make it work was to first physically remove the M.2, then install Windows, then add the M.2 back again. Which sucked a lot, because M.2s are really not optimized for easy or frequent installation and deinstallation.
- I have no idea what you're talking about. I mean that in the sense that whatever you've used to install Windows, it must not be common knowledge or the default.
  If you need special knowledge or access, I would call that "difficulty". So even though, after you had all your special knowledge or access, it was easy, acquiring those preconditions was hard.
  I.e. it was difficult to install Windows overall.
  
  You're in the Linux memes sub. Linux users are the ultimate example of special knowledge PC users....
  
  Not common knowledge to use Rufus?
  What else do you use to create bootable flash drives?

If you are good with a slightly more complicated install process and don't need access to Windows tools (like Outlook, Teams, Word, PowerPoint, etc), you can run Linux on bare metal to access the full potential of your hardware without any overhead from virtualization or emulation.
-microsoft

You can install the enterprise iot version or running chris titus's debloat script. But if you do this, you're technically savvy enough to use Linux and really want to/have to stay on Windows.
- Just because you can use Linux doesn't always mean you want to use Linux.

Installing debloated windows is not difficult at all.
- And how difficult is it to keep it debloated? MS seems to be hellbent on pushing their crap into everyone's face.
  
  Every Windows apologist: "I will keep current on the hacks to fix it forever, easy."
  I'm glad I invested the time learning Linux before I had kids and now have no time for anything.
  
  It's been fine for me so far.
- I would say it is, it's extra installation steps. Fedora I just click a handful of buttons and the OS is installed with no Spyware
- Its called Installing linux.

Fedora takes 0 brain power to install.
- Fedora has hands down the worst installer I've ever seen. Some distros don't have one, yes, some don't have a GUI one, yes, some require additional configuration afterwards, yes, but Fedora's is just confusing as hell for no good reason.
  It's also the only distro I had sound issues (i.e. no sound at all) with ever, and the only one where an installation has straight up failed to a point it created an unbootable system.
  tldr: I wanted to try Fedora and capitulated on install. Still enough brainpower for EndeavourOS btw.
  
  I spent around an hour trying to understand how to use Fedora's manual partitioner. I think I just ended up partitioning it with gparted or cfdisk from a different system. Never had problems with manual partitioning on other distros' installers.

difficulity
The difficulity of spelling difficulity is very difficulit.

I call bullshit. It only took me 3 hours to compile and install gentoo on my latest build and get proper desktop environment working. Granted I'm still tweaking the config files 4 years later, but it's perfect!

Where’s Arch if you don’t RTFM? (I mean we’ve got 2 windows install modes there… only fair)
- Wait there is more, installing Arch with knowing about the existence of "archinstall" and without.
- I'd say that is above windows. R-ing the FM is quite essential to arch or gentoo.

Kubuntu is also super easy.

The windows one seems exaggerated until you try to set it up with a regular local account.
Setting up a scratch install VM is such a pain.
- Setting up a local user account only is easy. Shift+f10 to open command prompt and then run OOBE\BYPASSNRO and then you can run the setup with zero network requirements and zero account requirements.
  
  That no longer works.
  Tried it on my girlfriend's new gaming laptop about 4 months ago and it did nothing, so just went back to using my custom Rufus install.
- Yeah, setup win 10 install on qemu may need to jump some hoop, especually when you want to enable features like gpu pass through.
  Although qemu may not be as easy as virtualbox/vmware, the performance is worth it.

Hobbyist here, in my opinion reading the manual or the wiki is easy, understanding it quickly is not. You can obvioulsy follow the instructions blindly and still succeed.
For the most part is very comprehensive but sometimes you are left alone to connect the dots which is very daunting when instructions get technical and you do not understand them.
In the end it felt like one of those half semester courses Universities try to cram in.

Stupid list leaves off the most popular linux install and puts that fringe one in.
- Which one are you calling fringe? These are all popular distros, with the exception of maybe Gentoo but that's still very well known even if not that many people daily drive it. Also still makes sense in this context to include a well known distro that's also known for being relatively hard to install
- Unbuntu?

Funny meme but let's be serious:
The steps to install Arch.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Installation_guide
The steps to install de bloated Windows:
Download Tiny Windows.
Use Rufus to make a boot USB. Click ok.
Mint is where it's at.
- that windows install isn't the procedure m$ tells you to use though. the correct comparison to that IMO would be using one of the 4 or 5 easy arch installers.
  that said I'd still use bazzite. now a real janky ass install would be fedora core os on an sbc, using emmc for boot but nvme for root.
  
  If you want debloated Windows, you already aren't using the procedure Microsoft wants you to use. So why would you even care?
  If you follow Microsoft's procedure, it takes less than 5 minutes to get a working setup.
- The steps to install Arch.
  https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Installation_guide
  Oh no, manually partitioning disks and chrooting? Someone call a computerologist.

post windows 7/early 10 versions, I would place it harder than arch. I had to go through a bunch of shit to get my mobo mount nvme drives to show up, then came the cursed hell of just clicking through all the setup questions where they make it sound like you have a choice, but you don't unless you do the custom install image bullshit aka the harder windows install on the chart.
- Can you easily capture images in arch? As in for multiple distributions later? Or is it based around copying the partitions
  
  Can you cook macaroni? Or is it based on boiling water?
  All data is stored on partitions, so one way or another you copy them. Easiest way to copy them is to dd. Second easiest way is to mount rootfs and boot fs and do mksquashfs on them. Third way is to pack it to tarball like Gentoo does.

Isn't debloated windows just a regular windows install after running https://github.com/Sycnex/Windows10Debloater ? Is there more to it?
- I prefer LTSC and Raphire's debloat script https://github.com/Raphire/Win11Debloat and I wouldn't say it's onerous. A nit-picky peeve with ad-hoc Windows installs is that setting the keyboard input for the installer doesn't define the default, and that Windows 11 has gone backwards in terms of setting up default user profile settings, much more single user focused.

I set up a kiosk on a Linux Mint machine today. From blank, unformatted drive to fully deployed kiosk, it took less time than just installing a base install of win11.
- How did you set up the kiosk? I've been looking for an alternative to Windows Kiosk mode on Linux for a while now.

Why is Debian more difficult than Fedora? I could understand older versions, but these days they fixed pretty much all the small annoyances. No need to use the "nonfree" iso, because that's integrated into the installer. And post install sudo works as expected out of the box. I'd say they should be equal.

What about Ubuntu?
- It takes too long to listen to Lemmy users tell you why not to.

Unless you install Linux mint with multiple displays. Holy 1 sec flickering sideways displays Batman. I don’t remember what I did exactly to fix but probably single display until drivers are all installed.
- Omg please tell me when you do, I'm running Mint on my laptop but want to migrate my desktop over soon which has multiple displays
  
  I’m pretty sure that was the fix. Start the installation with a normal single monitor. Once the OS is installed, run update manager to download and install updates. This would include GPU drivers. My second monitor is in portrait mode which I think was the culprit.

Hey! You missed nixos!
First time install for smb. Double the windows Bar.
Second time (if you backed up your config file)
No bar!

Debloated windows is very easy. Installs super fast and I don't even have to be there to push any buttons.
- is there an installer edition that doesn't put you through the questionnaire for what level of bullshit they can trick you in to accepting?
  Are you sure you're sure that your sure that you definitely aren't unsure about making an online account? Well here's the form for it anyway because you didn't remove all your network devices and use an edited install iso. And while we're at it, here's copilot, and a trial for office that you get billed for if you forget, and all your stuff is on onedrive securely stored for the safe perusal of relevant parties. Now please wait while we get things ready for you. You might think this unexplained loading screen is longer than the full time it takes to install most linux distros but we assure you important computery stuff is happening.
  
  Of course there is. Windows gets used in professional settings.
  You can setup a Windows Deployment Service where you can deploy Windows from a network boot with all the settings already incorporated.
  The only thing you need to do is boot the computer from network and let it do its thing.
  Afterwards you have a complete working setup with all the correct settings and updates and software already installed. With literally 1 minute of work.
- try disabling/removing edges, then good luck installing any updates after that

oobe bypass.
A post install script.
Alternatively, Tiny10

So by linux, you mean not every open OS? Can we add freebsd? Not the easiest but lots of users willing to help on a forum post.

This is 100% true, but the chart inverts when you have a problem you're trying to fix.

I'm not familiar with Mint and I only installed Fedora twice/on two baremetal PCs ... but how much easier can you go compared to Debian?
\ Is it like a cleaner UI or more preinstalled essentials?
- if you are already using fedora I don't see any value in switching to debian or mint.
  
  Im not using Fedora (nor Debian or Mint), I like my weeds to tumble & my susey to be open.
  Also I ... wouldn't ask which distro is easer to install just to switch to that one bcs of that reason. Sounds redundant.
  But with Proxmox (a hypervisor) for virtual machines Debian is my go-to (as with most users everywhere) and Im too lazy for templates so I install a few Debians from scratch now and then - and it takes like no time. So I was wandering if Mint just has less steps or some other friendliness tricks.

Man, seems hard for you guys to just choose English UK when installing windows...
- Ничего не понял. Кого по УК посадили?
  
  I said English UK but you're free to try it with any language that doesn't make Microsoft believe you're from the US or Canada, but I bet a European country would be best considering the amount of laws they have to prevent abuse by corporations compared to the rest of the world...

There is no way Gentoo is that low.

I want to buy a Framework laptop soon. I have the option to choose which Linux distro is best for me and load that on.
Any suggestions?
- Transitioning from Windows to Linux Mint was effortless for me, everything worked out of the box and i haven't typed a line of code yet. All i've had to to do is install Diodon to get the clipboard history feature.
  However all i've done with it is internet and office work, basic stuff. No gaming, no video editing, no 3D animation or any such. I think if you have a mature and complicated creative workflow it's totally possible that you'll struggle to move to Linux
  
  I've heard Linux Mint is pretty straightforward. Might just go with it, at least at first. Thanks!
  And yeah that's what I would do anyways. Basically web surfing and whatnot
- Just install Windows 11
  
  Lol
- What are you intending to do with your laptop?
  
  Mostly web surf, listen to music, take notes, do file organization, etc. I have my Steam Deck for gaming, and I'd probably use web-based apps for the engineering work I do before loading anything onto my laptop
  But I may also want to download things like FreeCAD and other tools in the future
- System76 has their own OS. You should start there and move on if you wanted to.
  
  PopOS! Is not as user friendly as it seems to linux veterans.

Is there any guide to install this Debloated Windows? 🤔
So far what I used is to use debloater script and also to disable that windows update service related stuff. Just wondering whether there is more unhinged part in it.
Also no custom rom android image? because technically it use older and customized linux kernel.
- There's also Tiny 10 and Tiny 11, which take it even further. They're genuinely small, too, they did good work.
- Well now there's also Windows 11 Enterprise IoT LTSC edition you can use
  
  While I also have those Win 10 and 11 LTSC versions on my ventoy drive, I just wondering whether you can tweak further aside of uninstalling stuff through powershell and disabling services through registries because I just enjoy being superuser (questioning what is referred in this post image).
  Yes I like collecting OS images and troubleshoot toolkit isos as Im being "IT Support" on my circles.
  EDIT: I will read every comment on this post in case someone on comment have already elaborate further.

I‘d place archinstall lower than mint 🤭

The debate has never been so intense! It might not be the Year of the Linux Desktop, but that's certainly a great one