Skip Navigation

Chappell Roan Says She’s “Voting For F@cking Kamala,” But No VP Endorsement & “F@ck Trump, For F@cking Real”

United States | News & Politics @lemmy.ml

Chappell Roan Says She’s “Voting For F@cking Kamala,” But No VP Endorsement & “F@ck Trump, For F@cking Real”

2 10
234 comments
  • It's bizarre that libs got mad at her either now or in the first place. I've heard this bizarre take of "Voting is not an endorsement!" plenty of times on here, and it just means that the person believes in unconditionally supporting the Dems while assuaging their conscience by sending thoughts and prayers to alter reality. Publically saying that you'll vote for someone is an endorsement. It doesn't matter what thoughts you hold on your head unless those thoughts actually impact material reality in some way.

  • Liberals: "There is no such thing as Blue MAGA."

    Also Liberals: "Why aren't you pledging your undying loyalty to Harris without question just like me?" 😡

    She had a very fair and reasonable take. Anyone should be skeptical and voting for Harris to Deny Trump is fine but that doesn't mean there aren't issues. People know the playbook by now material conditions and systematic issues won't get addressed post election.

    • Endorsing is not the same as undying loyalty. Seems obvious. But I guess it has to be stated clearly.

      I think it's perfectly fine to criticize anybody who says they'll do everything in their power to support LGBTQ+, and then refuse to endorse Harris (even though she basically has).

    • Issues don't get fixed after election because voters go in thinking it's a four year duty, not a continuous one. The uninformed voter name applies both during election time and between. Vote for the one that has the most potential to change (which means getting more progressive reps in Congress too) and then ride their ass their whole term if they aren't making a difference you like, or if they do what you expect from them let them know they're doing well. They are representatives by title, but they can't represent who they don't hear from.

      So by many factors the above eliminates voting for Trump. This is a no-brainer vote, but the public has to put in some effort after they get people in office too. A big part of this problem is representation number in Congress, we ought to have a smaller rep/population ration than we do. But the other is a public that forgets to pay attention until it becomes a media headline.

234 comments