Skip Navigation

Would being a Linux "power user" increase my chances of getting a job in IT/tech?

I'm trying to get a job in IT that will (hopefully) pay more than a usual 9 to 5. I'm been daily driving Linux exclusively for about 2 1/2 years now and I'm trying to improve my skills to the point that I could be considered a so-called "power user." My question is this: will this increase my hiring chances significantly or marginally?

111 comments
  • It will. Keep in mind that, depending on the type of job, you'll have to keep learning new tech just to keep up: virtualization, containers, orchestrators, automation, backups, logging, auditing, scripting and God knows what else. It's a good starting point to get you the jobs that the Windows crowd won't touch because of the command line.

  • When I got into IT, I had years of experience with Mac OS, UNIX, a bit of IRIX and VMS, BSD and even a bit of Linux.

    And then I spent 10 years mostly managing a Windows shop. I still ran OpenBSD on the internal support servers, but had to support a full Microsoft stack for anything customer-facing.

    What will increase your hiring chances is being adaptable and having a portfolio of success stories to reference during interviews.

  • get a cheap mini-pc and set it up as a linux router/server/lab

    does wonders to teach you the tech used in the industry, and you can even setup your own netflix, google drive, spotify and more.

    1. don't call yourself "power user"

    It might just be me but it gives off "I can set up a printer, yay!" vibes.

  • In my personal experience, yes. There are so many jobs that exist around the Linux ecosystem, being comfortable with concepts like piping, file permissions, scripting, git, etc, will invariably give you a leg up.

  • Depends what you mean with a job in tech. If you want to work as technical problem solver or programmer, then it's very useful, almost required.

  • "In IT" could mean anything from first line support worker to software project manager to network engineer. Can you be more specific...?

111 comments