SOON
SOON
SOON
You're viewing a single thread.
I mean didn't this just pave the way for Rome to be ruled by one unaccountable autocrat or another for the next several hundred years?
Yeah but it got better eventually, right?
...right?...
Yeah, Caesar is a bad comparison. Sulla fits better, although at least he was legitimately successful before his coup.
It was worse before autocrats, they were seen as someone better.