made supporting overt nazis socially acceptable?
added a fun element of danger to walking in the countryside for the next few decades at least?
good work for scrap metal dealers?
significantly fewer people to govern?
less territory to defend?
Rather than risk a protracted war with the added danger of waning Western support, Ukraine needs to lock in what it has already achieved. It has exposed the limits of Russian military power. It has established credible claims to EU and North Atlantic Treaty Organization membership. It has transformed its international image from a den of corruption to a land of heroes.
If "exposing the limits of Russian military power" is one of their achievements, then I agree they'd better move to lock it in pretty fucking fast because "exposing the limits of NATO military power" is going to become an increasingly dominant theme the longer this drags on.
Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the past year is how well the economy has held up under the strain of war and occupation, even allowing for the fact that around 70% of the Ukrainian budget is covered by international assistance. Inflation has been kept under control, falling from 27% in December to 11% last month. GDP will grow slightly next year by 1%-2%.
Yes, shooting a dying geriatric with steroids to make them stand up is not a bad outlook
Dude, I'm going to show you how to get rich with this simple trick:
step 1: find a dependent capitalist country and destabilize its government
step 2: find a way to destroy it's public infrastructure. Just coopt a local comprador class and defund everything, but if all else fails just start a war.
Well, I'm Brazilian so I can tell you: they'll do it as many times as we allow them.
Since the 90s we had at least three neoliberal waves in Brazil with mass privatization and austerity measures, punctuated by center-left periods of "it's ok to enrich banks but let's at least guarantee that people can eat" periods.