A Bunch of Rocks (17 Nov 2008)
A Bunch of Rocks (17 Nov 2008)
Hover Text:
I call Rule 34 on Wolfram's Rule 34.
A Bunch of Rocks (17 Nov 2008)
Hover Text:
I call Rule 34 on Wolfram's Rule 34.
You're viewing a single thread.
Except it's not a simulation of the universe, it's a bunch of stones on the ground. There is no continuity.
He bases the next row of stones on the previous one, changing them by a consistent rule? Its an unorthodox computer with infinite memory. Why does that not count as a simulation? I'm not following
The only computation that is happening is when he compares two rocks. He doesn't have the memory to store all computations simultaneously.
It's like having a "simulation" of the universe on a hard drive and only really computing on plankt measurement at a time by changing the bits on the hard drive. The data is there, but that's it it's not a live interaction.
I think I see where you're coming from. The computer in the comic is a Rule 110 automata, known to be Turing complete. It can perform complex calculations, allegedly.
I suppose it can get a bit philosophical whether an incomplete time instant is even visible from the inside of a simulation, because nothing moves after a single pass until the full frame is complete, hence limiting perception.
Unless you mean continuity as in non discrete physics, which is fair play for this specific computer but then there is the Planck length to consider.(edit: I am aware that discrete vs continuous is a whole holy war on its own)