You're viewing a single thread.
It's funny that one instance of child rape apologia creates so much more in these comments. There are some real debate lords(/trolls) out here making arguments that would be immediately tossed if faced with a child victim in real life.
We also shouldn’t have to rely on these cases to protect a woman’s inherent right to her body.
An Unborn child isn't "her body" (Let's see how you spin this as a "Rape Apology")
sfgsdgdsgdsgdsgdfs
It’s using her body so she has every right to remove it in the same way it’s legal to shoot someone who’s on top raping her.
It’s not her body. It’s a parasite
Nothing to spin. It isn’t a child. It’s a fetus. That’s the whole crux of the debate. You think it’s a person, many of us do not. If this argument was the slam dunk you think it is then the entire debate wouldn’t exist.
Are you so arrogant as to think you’ve solved arguably the most challenging and controversial ethics questions of the modern era?