zik @ zik @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

316

Joined

2 yr. ago

They probably just mean they've worked out a loophole in the law which they're going to exploit the heck out of. I doubt they've changed their attitude on this overnight.

He was also instrumental in the election fraud to try to get Biden's election overturned.

They don't think that. Take South Australia for example - it's moving towards 100% renewables with the help of a mix of sources including battery storage. There's no need for non-renewable nuclear energy in the mix.

If I had to name any chocolate that tastes like it has lead and cadmium in it, that'd be Hershey's.

Am I correct in thinking that tour bus operators made the bottom four paper signs and just taped them to the bottom of the legitimate signs here?

Is it funny? I just find myself confused.

BHP was the one behind the weak messages attributed to the yes campaign. They deliberately played this one to lose.

The thing is she randomly got lucky and proven right due to a pandemic that no-one expected. There are a huge number of other scientists out there who were also right but never had that luck.

Sounds like treason to me.

When's someone going to have the balls to charge him with it, and then sentence him to death for it?

Smoking's already dramatically fallen out of popularity with younger people, being replaced by vaping. So I don't think it really matters what they do at this point - smoking's a dinosaur waiting to die.

That's what forcing people to return to the office does I guess.

And yet it's the auto industry lobby who's trotting this line out because they're not really ready for EVs and this is a good delaying tactic for them.

It's almost like people are incapable of comprehending that all types of pollution are important, not just one or the other. Exhaust emissions are bad. Tyre pollution is also bad. Reducing one is a good step. Reducing both would be even better.

I've seen The White Stripes live at a festival and honestly they were one of the tighter acts there. Sure, they choose to use a lo-fi sound but the actual playing was pretty great.

It’s most commonly used in the UK

Also common in Australia

Even the theoretically recyclable ones don't usually get recycled because it's economically unviable in most cases.

Also Just for Laughs mostly uses people who are already in on the joke, which helps.

It's probably been in development since 2009 when it was cutting edge.

So it turns out that it's not a lack of women giving them a bad attitude - it's their bad attitude giving them a lack of women. Who'd have thought.

I think whatever wildlife was affected by it suffered their main disappointment a couple of thousand years ago.