Xanza @ Xanza @lemm.ee

Posts

2

Comments

1,066

Joined

3 mo. ago

Moderating

---

I was thinking more like President but you do you.

I would assume not. At this point he could drive the car into a volcano and they would make up reasons about why it was actually a good thing.

Is what it is.

The last time the US did wide sweeping tariffs it plunged a stagnant economy into the great depression. That was 95-96 years ago. Trump does the same thing expecting different results, gets even greater depression.

It's funny because you have every expert known to man saying "this will be devastating for the economy" and no one listened. Now everyone's 401k evaporates and they care all of a sudden. They were told this would happen and no one cared.

Caddy manages everything, including certs for both domains. So I guess my answer would be, you don't.

Caddy does not need 80 and 443.

By default and all measurable expectation it does. Unless you can't use privileged HTTP/HTTPS ports, there's no real reason to use unprivileged ports.

Besides, op doesn’t mention having problems with ports

OP said he was having issues, and this is a common issue I've had. Since he was non-descript as to what the issues were, it's really not stupid to mention it.

Well that's dope... Didn't know that was a thing.

I mean, I don't work for the AP. But if you absolutely must have a sensationalized title, I probably would go with "Harrowing Toll in Gaza Strike--Majority of Victims Reported to Be Children."

The biggest issue I have with Caddy and running ancillary services as some services attempt to utilize port 80 and/or 443 (and may not be configurable), which of course isn't possible because Caddy monopolizes those ports. The best solution to this I've found is to migrate Caddy and my services to docker containers and adding them all to the same "caddy" network.

With your caddy instance still monopolizing port 80 and 443, you can use the Docker expose or port parameters to allow your containers to utilize port 80 and/or 443 from within the container, but proxify it on the host network. This is what my caddy config looks like;

 caddy

    
{
        admin 127.0.0.1:2019
        email {email}
        acme_dns cloudflare {token}
}
domain.dev, domain.one {
        encode zstd gzip
        redir https://google.com/
}
*.domain.dev, *.domain.one {
        encode zstd gzip
        @book host bk.domain.dev bk.domain.one
        handle @book {
                reverse_proxy linkding:9090
        }
        @git host git.domain.dev git.domain.one
        handle @git {
                reverse_proxy rgit:8000
        }
        @jelly host jelly.domain.dev jelly.domain.one
        handle @jelly {
                reverse_proxy {ip}:8096
        }
        @status host status.domain.dev status.domain.one
        handle @status {
                reverse_proxy status:3000
        }
        @wg host wg.domain.dev wg.domain.one
        handle @wg {
                reverse_proxy wg:51820
        }
        @ping host ping.domain.dev ping.domain.one
        handle @ping {
                respond "pong!"
        }
}

  

It works very well.

Sure, but look at the title. You don't call, after blowing up a school, child casualties "people." That's what we call trying to soften the blow.

Strike on school

17 people killed

lol ok. Anything not to paint Israel as child murderers, I guess. Careful not to consume the boot.

Hey look, a crime.

It's likely illegal. The administration would call it theft of service because it's not authorized and they wouldn't be wrong. I also don't see why you would want to do it. You're giving the IT department at your school complete access to your web history.

I can't for the life of me understand how you're having a difficulty understanding this to begin with....

You said that at 4% market share they would be idiots to not break their backs chasing that 4% in revenue but were there right now and they're not breaking their back at all they're hardly doing anything...

The entirety of your statements that you've said so far are verifiably incorrect because they are the reality that we're living right now. I'm not the one that struggling with reality buddy, that's you.

Nothing happens. A bill like this is not designed to do anything productive, but rather give senators of springboard to politically denounce what Donald Trump is doing because he hired a middle-aged billionaire high on ketamine to gut the government.

It allows them political safe haven to denounce what the President is doing. Why they need a political safe haven to be able to do that? You would have to ask someone smarter than me because I just don't understand it.

Nobody said they're not. Jesus. You get really upset when someone points out that you're wrong, don't you?

Fact of the matter is, is that *nix is less than 4% of the market, and they're not going to upset the market for that 4%. It will eventually get bigger, but until it does, there's not a lot of hope.

This is the year of the linux desktop.

It's not trust me bro at all. That's the situation we're currently in. So if these businesses would be "crazy" to leave all this money on the table and they currently are, what does that say to you?

I know critical thinking is hard, but try.

1. This number is taken from the Wikipedia page, and represents a lab setting from totally uncompressed to full HEVC encoding. It's not representative of data savings that you get from one video codec vs another, which is likely less than 4-6% between something like VP9 and HEVC... The 25-50% of completely fucking laughable in a realistic setting and you look like and idiot for bringing it up.
2. It's absolutely an overestimation by every conceivable metric available.
3. You can encode to whatever you want, but if you take a VP9 encoded video and re-encode it, you may only save 1% and it will take several hours to encode. There are even situations where you will save nothing, or the resultant video file is actually larger even with HEVC.

It's zipping a zip file. Endlessly re-compressing things doesn't yield positive results in the way you describe.

The market share is already there and there not doing open source drivers, so I guess you're empirically wrong. I dunno what else to tell ya.

Well they're not, so I guess they are. 🤷‍♂️

I don't disagree, but at the same time, circle back to my original statement. Even if every single *nix user were to only use open source drivers, that's still not enough. 4% of the market share isn't going to change anyone's mind about *nix support.