Or just have a common name, but allow people to put in a group nickname that only applies to them.
Do you think it's normal for people to be downvoted so hard just for giving their opinion? It's not even a controversial one, just debatable. This is part of Lemmy that I find to be worse than Reddit, and it sucks to see it everytime.
Thanks, I'll check out what they did later.
And keep repeating those words until you're satisfied. Maybe you can finally understand why they're meaningless.
Which game is that, if you don't mind me asking?
Nah, it's something you're lucky enough to learn coincidentally or you don't. And if you found out too late in life, you might be too stubborn to learn it at that point.
Says the guys who started throwing the insult. It's nice that you are kind of self aware of your own shortcomings.
Oh, you actually know what your problem is, good job.
Doesn't sound like you understand it very much, like I thought so.
What does that even mean? Neural networks have varying levels of complexity, even within the same technology. Even the same LLM model can have different number of tokens that differentiate the complexity of their operation.
So instead of using a neural network that is designed to input and output text and making it learn to output coding, which is also text, you think it's supposed to be easier for them to make it instead analyse various video and audio input from multiple cameras, and then output the various actions that is required for it to drive a car? Does that make sense to you?
I think you're completely wrong by still comparing skills that have no relation to each other. What's the similarity between driving and coding that would require an LLM to be need to do one before you can believe it can do the other? Explain that leap in logic properly before you continue with your argument.
An LLM is designed to output text. Expecting them to drive to prove their ability to output code is like expecting them to dance to prove their ability to produce poems. It's inability to do an unrelated skill has no bearing on it's ability to do a different one. You're basically judging a fish on its ability to walk on land, and using that as the basis to judge its ability to swim.
Most adults can also learn to code, if they actually tried. If you're gonna add the argument that most people can't code proficiently, most people can't drive proficiently, either.
Also, driving and coding are completely different set of skills that it's kinda worthless to compare them. Some people can code just fine but might never learn how to drive because they didn't need to, so to consider driving as a prerequisite skill to coding doesn't make sense.
No way are you going to convince me 99% of the population can drive. Go get a more accurate statistics before trying to use it to dismiss something.
I also thought it was intentional, and hilarious, but this one is definitely an improvement.
The Pixel 4 has a Snapdragon 855 which does have a neural engine, which is similar to the AI engine used in AI laptops, so you're just completely wrong there.