solo @ solo @piefed.social Posts 12Comments 5Joined 2 days ago
Newly-declared conservation area in Peru is home to pink dolphins, giant armadillos and woolly monkeys
Building climate resilience in the island nation of Dominica
‘Ticking timebomb’: sea acidity has reached critical levels, threatening entire ecosystems – study
When will a vital system of currents in the Atlantic Ocean collapse? Depends on whom you ask.
Heat Waves Are Changing Disease Dynamics in Unpredictable Ways, New Research Finds
Carbon capture company emits more than it captures | CCS illusion only delays the elimination of fossil fuels
Kabul at risk of becoming first modern city to run out of water, report warns
‘It was our hope spot’: scientists heartbroken as pristine coral gardens hit by Western Australia’s worst bleaching event
That was fast! Thank you
I am not really sure I understand what you mean. Of course 0.5°C is very important, but to my understanding, the Paris Agreement is really not going as planned.
As the official deadline passes for countries to submit their revised Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement, only 13 of the 195 parties have done so. Alarmingly, this group includes just five developed countries, which are required to lead the way on climate action.
Under the Paris Agreement, every country must update its national climate action plan every five years. These NDC plans outline how nations intend to reduce emissions and adapt to climate impacts to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. This year’s submissions should extend their new NDCs to 2030 and outline new objectives for the period up to 2035, setting the tone for a decisive decade of climate action.
[source]
Edit: Since the above article dates a few months back I searched for something more updated and found the perfect link: NDC Tracker
It looks like the IMO's pledge to reduce emissions by at least 20% is totally feasible. At least according to the following recent study
Reducing travel speeds and using an intelligent queuing system at busy ports can reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from oceangoing container vessels by 16-24%, according to researchers. Not only would those relatively simple interventions reduce emissions from a major, direct source of greenhouse gases, the technology to implement these measures already exists.
Maybe so, maybe no. It's not predetermined.
It's what we do now that will shape the future. I mean, we the people. We cannot rely on governments or corporations to do the right thing without us forcing them to. By now, we know this.
So, I believe that conversations about solutions are more fruitful than deterministic statements, no matter how highly upvoted these statements are.
I thought of adding this article too, because it looks like there are Some Hopeful News About the Future of the World’s Corals.
Much has been learned about heat-resistant corals in the last decade. Village by village and beach by beach, reef restoration is progressing.