nasezero [comrade/them] @ nasezero @hexbear.net

Posts

11

Comments

122

Joined

2 yr. ago

Democrats rapidly courting the dog murdering demographic

MIT's encampment got Israelied

Bit idea: blaming libs for not putting all of their money into the stock market when Biden loses

"I see you spent $8 on a blue checkmark, when you could have spent that on a fractional share of Amazon stock and used your voting weight to give Biden a guest appearance on season 4 of The Boys

Mainstream media collaborating to manufacture ammo for zionists/cops to use as justification for increase violence against the protestors https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1785526485367050385

Their family dinners:

You're right, I should add a $30 fee for the funnel

$75 for a Financial Times subscription?! Why spend that much when for just $10 a month, I'll hold you down, put a funnel in your ear, and squeeze pudding directly into your skull

This book should be reimagined into a remake/reimagining of Stephen King's 11.22.63, but instead of our time traveling main character trying to stop the assassination of JFK, he keeps going back to Yale in 1971 to cockblock Bill

Holy shit it reads like an extremely amateurish West Wing fanfic

Also is it just me, or are the liberals getting more into trump-like language? This fantasized speech reads a lot like how Trump and his fans will constantly insist that he's definitely super healthy and has a bigly brain. I guess it's an inevitable sharpening contradiction as all they can do is cope as Biden's mental state becomes increasingly more obvious.

Cheaper food? But at what cost??

Not voting for Kodos is a vote for Kang

Some other angles to come at:

• Remind him that when we're talking about the "1%", we're talking about people with this much money. And explain that even people with far less can still maintain their capital if they invest it in a business or rental properties. For every person who loses their inheritance or lottery winnings, there's many multiple other dipshit landlords and small business owners that manage to survive, not through any sort of special skill or competence, but merely through the means of owning capital. Which they either inherited and/or built through exploiting others. (See: surplus labor)
• Make him watch Wyatt Ingram Koch draw preschool-level shirt designs while drinking champagne on yachts. If he still believes in a meritocracy after this, just bully him relentlessly for thinking Wyatt Koch is more deserving of his money than literally any random person on the street.

You really need to start from square one, because this dude is misunderstanding the most basics of material reality.

The 1% don't make money through their own hard work, they make it through other people's hard work. Value is created by labor, and the only people performing that labor are the workers, not corporate executives like CEOs and other suits. All the "profits" going to executives and shareholders are therefore value stolen from the workers.

Some of this might be hard to get through depending on how young and naive they are. I've worked both manual labor jobs, and jobs where I've interacted with administrative/executive types daily, so I've got firsthand experience with how much the latter are worthless dipshits and ghouls. Rejecting capitalism is easy when you actually see how the sausage is made from start to finish. But if this dude's experience is limited to watching the west wing or whatever while they work a cushy desk job, then they're probably going to base their ideology off of the typical "unskilled labor" propaganda that permeates western society.

If he's open to it, get him to watch some labor theory of value 101 videos. Here's a decent one. But, if he really believes in his heart that people like Bezos are somehow "more deserving" of their wealth than Amazon delivery drivers who are working so intensely that they have to piss in bottles, then I don't think it's worth your energy trying to convince him of basic humanity. Personally, I would just bully such a person until they feel enough shame to do some introspection, or avoid me so I don't have to deal with their bullshit. (I'm going to be honest, anyone who says "us humans are not equal, we don't deserve what we have" is not worth your energy imo, but good luck anyways if you consider them enough of a friend to try and deprogram them.)

I've been here for 3 years, since the migration from the subreddit. Yes, this is a new account; I created it because my og account was an edgy reference to the 2020 US primary that I felt didn't age as well as the thing it was referencing became more and more dated. I said as much and linked said account when registering this new account, the mods approved the registration of this account, so

Yes, I am highly invested because I immediately recognized you posting the same ragebait videos that incels spam at her on the hellsite that is Twitter, and it really fucking stung to see that same thing happen here from a supposed leftist.

I am begging you to do some introspection on why you are the one doing harm here and owe an apology. I don't even necessarily disagree that streaming can absolutely be parasocial and alienating! But, I promise you that the mods aren't deleting your comments out of some defense of the merits of streaming: it's because your comments were personally offensive to a fellow community member, including posting a harmful video that you have yet to apologize for. Ironically, you are exhibiting the very kind of anti-social behavior you are claiming streaming facilitates!

I'm not debating you on why what you did was bad. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and was hoping you'd do some self-reflection, but now you are doubling-down, so yes, I do hope you get silenced

Oh my bad, I didn't realize you were the sole arbiter of acceptable forms of content as a leftist! Just so we're clear:

Is that right?

Not having any context and not doing more digging before posting the first link that confirms your bias is not a good excuse. I hope I don't have to explain why. You posted a video that was created by sexist chuds to harass OP. Whether or not you intended for it to be sexist harassment is immaterial, it was and sharing here furthers that harassment.

You seem like an otherwise good-faith comrade, so I am urging you to stop and reflect why policing a fellow community member for being a streamer is

Edit: lmao nvm, I hope you get the

https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/2110269-eve-barlow-eve-fartlow

As if battlefield cum retrieval wasn't enough of a dirty job