huppakee @ huppakee @lemm.ee

Posts

25

Comments

1,311

Joined

2 mo. ago

Still disagree although I agree that is a very problematic aspect. I think the ai companies have been given too much freedom. I'm also fine with everybody choosing not to use it. I also agree artists were fucked over and deserve artistic credits and financial compensation, I will support them getting this. I myself have not generated an image that looks like something from Ghibli for example. But still, all things considered; I don't think banning all ai generated content a reasonable thing to do. But that has more to do with my world view concerning individual freedom than how I view ai generated things and the behaviour of ai companies.

Glad for UK then, but this price is artificial in the sense that the UK gov asks for import duties etc to be sure BYD doesn't under cut European brands. If BYD manage to sell more dolphins than VW sells ID3's, than BYD is building a better car or has better marketing; that's good.

My point is exactly that her reason for saying this is because the fact she is negotiating, what I meant with calling bullshit is that I don't think this person is saying this from a genuine belief. Might be true that she thinks this, I just don't think she would have said it if she wasn't in a negotiation.

I think living in a democracy (and I consider this also as one, dispute there not being elections) is accepting I don't make the rules. And in that case I rather have clear rules I disagree with than vague rules that give me a desire to argue about my interpretation of them all the time.

Also good that we follow the instance, since that means that if people have a problem with a certain rule than there is a set place for that discussion and we as a community can be free of arguments about them. Plus if I want to try and change a certain rule, I know where I need to direct my time and energy to.

I agree those two are bad things, but it is to me not enough reason to ban it entirely.

Yeah I thought so, would be very stupid to buy stuff with a kill switch. But Poland is for example buying stuff from South-Korea because the queue at the European counterpart is too long for them. So not asking the money 100% on European goods isn't necessarily a bad thing.

I get your sarcasm, but since I believe your comment holds a serious conviction I want to ask: have you never seen lawbooks? Clarity is good, but not at all costs.

At the time of righting the upvote/downvote ratio is 30%, with a score of -4 so I feel it would be good if I make a comment here to say that this is written by a woman from England, so she is talking about people like herself.

I'll also share the following from the article to provide extra context:

Why isn’t this quiet form of female political alienation ringing more alarm bells?

But the failure even to be curious about what it is young women are trying to say, just because their chosen revolt against the mainstream takes a less aggressive or destructive form than young Reformers’, feels profoundly unfair. Sometimes it pays to listen to people sitting quietly at the back, not just the ones screaming in your face.

I'll refrain from expressing an opinion about the people who downvoted this article, since I don't know them.

Because of national laws about gay marriage differencing greatly and there being a lot of countries where religion plays a serious role in politics i wanted to share with you the actual legal articles, since these are quite easy to understand and the eu has these laws in all languages as well.

This is from the English version of the CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 11
Freedom of expression and information

1 Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.

Article 12
Freedom of assembly and of association

1 Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association at all levels, in particular in political, trade union and civic matters, which implies the right of everyone to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his or her interests.

Article 21
Non-discrimination

1 Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.

tl;dr No, it is not legal.

In The Netherlands too, they run big billboard ads and tv commercial like all established companies do.

There is also a big price gap, that gives people a big reason to care less about trust.

Doesn't mean the remaining 30% will be American stuff with a kill switch, if that's what you imply.

"Obviously I've been meeting Scott Bessent this week whilst I'm in Washington, but I've also this week met the French, the German, the Spanish, the Polish, the Swedish, the Finnish finance ministers - because it is so important that we rebuild those trading relationships with our nearest neighbours in Europe, and we're going to do that in a way that is good for British jobs and British consumers."

I do agree with her but I'm also calling bullshit because this is exactly what you'd say to improve your negotiation position. Note that she is already in Washington. She is trying to get a deal done. I mean good for her and I wish her and everyone in the UK all the best, but the UK tries to be the link between EU and US just like Meloni. They want best of both worlds (who doesn't).

The result of these talks will be the real news, this is just a cookie for the hungry journalists. A kind of fortune cookie that is meant as a message to the other guy at the negotiation table.

In that case the rules should be a) no wrong information and b) no low effort garbage, if you ask me.

You're right you can't, but if there is a rule you have clarity beforehand instead of arguments after.

I want to mention I'm personally not against AI generated content, and don't know why so many people seem against all forms of AI, especially when it comes to images, but i am against wrong information and low effort crap so it will just say you do you feddit.uk and good of our community to follow the instance.

I like it too and do use it, but unlike Foss alternatives they do use your data for commercial purposes, just so you know.

Well, I skipped "literally" so guess it's an easy mistake to make lol

You really are a genius, i wasn't sure before.

Every child knows a rule only counts if a) you're caught breaking them and b) you're punished for breaking them.b