huppakee @ huppakee @lemm.ee

Posts

25

Comments

1,401

Joined

2 mo. ago

That's true, I'm not saying it's unfair to artificially up the price with import duties, just wanted to point out price is also an important factor in people's decisions.

I'm not against that, but there might not be any diplomatic bullets left in the metaphorical chamber. Not saying Russia should get away with this, but an eye for an eye isn't always the best reaction. I think they should take note (which they seem to do) and fix as many holes in the system as possible, rather than just revange and hope that will make Russia think twice next time.

Then why did they use the phrase "why isn't this ringing alarm bells?" to describe the only leftist political party remaining in the UK?

"This" refers to young woman voting different, on average more left then before. Read the article first, then comment.

Is there also an AI non-original? Nvm, my sorting showed this first so I didn't get it was a reaction to something. This is way better, what was someone thinking when they made an almost exact copy of this image? What's the point?

What consequences would you suggest then?

I think the choice you have to make is wether you want to control the community or want to guide the community.

If you want you could for example make a rule like: posts that are neither news nor uplifting will be deleted. And then warn someome who posts non uplifting non news with a comment on that post, and ignore all the backlash. Next time the same person posts another non uplifting non news, just straight away delete it. If you would only do things everyone likes, you would have no function. You're the boss, you make the choices. Everybody can disagree, but they have 0 power. They can go and make a non uplifting non news community if they want.

Didn't think I'd end up saying this but thank god he made that moron.

How is it gonna be a civil war if the military is not on the governments side? I mean i have seen the stuff the us police and ICE gets, but neither would have the numbers or the tactical knowledge to win from the effing military. If the military would try and overthrow the president, I can't imagine FBI and CIA would try and stop them.

Might turn out like in Turkey though, were nothing really happened except 100,000 people getting convicted of treason or fired from their job.

I'll be honest, even if that is the only real reason for them doing this, I would still consider this good news.

If this were any other president than Trump it would've been a great Onion back in the day, but to be honest a headline like this wouldn't for a second make me doubt whether it's satire or not.

I agree, I don't see the writer arguing how radical or not the greens are. Her point is about these women, who are (just like young men) no longer voting for the parties in the middle. I think this is a trend also happening outside of the UK and here in The Netherlands nobody considers this a radical thing but we also have an ever increasing gap between the parties on the right (who attract more young men) and those on the left (who attract more young women).

I myself believe mysogonists in the far right behave much more problematic than the most radical climate protesters, and I understand why the attention goes to the increase of mysogony and racism. But I appreciate this article because it points out and explains quite well how young men voting right isn't the only thing happening in the political landscape.

Still disagree although I agree that is a very problematic aspect. I think the ai companies have been given too much freedom. I'm also fine with everybody choosing not to use it. I also agree artists were fucked over and deserve artistic credits and financial compensation, I will support them getting this. I myself have not generated an image that looks like something from Ghibli for example. But still, all things considered; I don't think banning all ai generated content a reasonable thing to do. But that has more to do with my world view concerning individual freedom than how I view ai generated things and the behaviour of ai companies.

Glad for UK then, but this price is artificial in the sense that the UK gov asks for import duties etc to be sure BYD doesn't under cut European brands. If BYD manage to sell more dolphins than VW sells ID3's, than BYD is building a better car or has better marketing; that's good.

My point is exactly that her reason for saying this is because the fact she is negotiating, what I meant with calling bullshit is that I don't think this person is saying this from a genuine belief. Might be true that she thinks this, I just don't think she would have said it if she wasn't in a negotiation.

I think living in a democracy (and I consider this also as one, dispute there not being elections) is accepting I don't make the rules. And in that case I rather have clear rules I disagree with than vague rules that give me a desire to argue about my interpretation of them all the time.

Also good that we follow the instance, since that means that if people have a problem with a certain rule than there is a set place for that discussion and we as a community can be free of arguments about them. Plus if I want to try and change a certain rule, I know where I need to direct my time and energy to.

I agree those two are bad things, but it is to me not enough reason to ban it entirely.

Yeah I thought so, would be very stupid to buy stuff with a kill switch. But Poland is for example buying stuff from South-Korea because the queue at the European counterpart is too long for them. So not asking the money 100% on European goods isn't necessarily a bad thing.

I get your sarcasm, but since I believe your comment holds a serious conviction I want to ask: have you never seen lawbooks? Clarity is good, but not at all costs.

At the time of righting the upvote/downvote ratio is 30%, with a score of -4 so I feel it would be good if I make a comment here to say that this is written by a woman from England, so she is talking about people like herself.

I'll also share the following from the article to provide extra context:

Why isn’t this quiet form of female political alienation ringing more alarm bells?

But the failure even to be curious about what it is young women are trying to say, just because their chosen revolt against the mainstream takes a less aggressive or destructive form than young Reformers’, feels profoundly unfair. Sometimes it pays to listen to people sitting quietly at the back, not just the ones screaming in your face.

I'll refrain from expressing an opinion about the people who downvoted this article, since I don't know them.

Because of national laws about gay marriage differencing greatly and there being a lot of countries where religion plays a serious role in politics i wanted to share with you the actual legal articles, since these are quite easy to understand and the eu has these laws in all languages as well.

This is from the English version of the CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 11
Freedom of expression and information

1 Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.

Article 12
Freedom of assembly and of association

1 Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association at all levels, in particular in political, trade union and civic matters, which implies the right of everyone to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his or her interests.

Article 21
Non-discrimination

1 Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.

tl;dr No, it is not legal.