froztbyte @ froztbyte @awful.systems Posts 16Comments 1,423Joined 2 yr. ago
market potential: all trustfund babies
highest tech battlefield gopnik discomobile
0% fucks given: I have seen exactly one episode of The Simpsons, ever. I've seen some clips and snippets here and there, other than that nada
this is a remarkably interesting thing with a surprisingly narrow scope. I don't know mil hardware/history well enough so I'm curious: would such opto-electric ewar actually have been a meaningful capability?
I can make a report on your case file but I don’t think they’ve replaced the 7 process supervisors they fired last year. there’s only Jo now and they seem to be in the office 24x7
gonna be “real good” when this starts happening to important-detail emails, like medical or insurance matters
imagine a legal demand getting caught up in this?
and yahoo’s probably just gonna shrug
cc @dgerard
haha, it's starting to happen: even fucking fortune is running a piece that throwing big piles of money on ever-larger training has done exactly fuckall to make this nonsense go anywhere
google's on their shit again
can't sneer it properly just yet, there's a lot
I was not aware of this, failed my constitution roll, and have taken psychic damage
heh yup. I think the most recent one (somewhere in the last year) was something like 12-bit rsa? stupendously far off from being a meaningful thing
I’ll readily admit to being a cryptography mutt and a qc know-barely-anything, and even from my limited understanding the assessment of where people are at (with how many qubits they’ve managed to achieve in practical systems) everything is hilariously woefully far off ito attacks
that doesn’t entirely invalidate pqc and such (since the notion there is not merely defending against today/soon but also a significant timeline)
one thing I am curious about (and which you might’ve seen or be able to talk about, blake): is there any kind of known correlation between qubits and viable attacks? I realize part of this quite strongly depends on the attack method as well, but off the cuff I have a guess (“intuition” is probably the wrong word) that it probably scales some weird way (as opposed to linear/log/exp)
those opinions should come with a whiplash warning, fucking hell
can’t wait to once again hear that someone is sure we’re “just overreacting” and that star of david passbooks voter ID laws will be totes fine. I’m sure it’ll be a really lovely conversation with a perfectly sensible and caring human. :|
ah, the novel QC RSA attack: shaking the algorithm so much it gets annoyed and gives up the plaintext out of desperation
"judge every molecule" and "simulation hypothesis" probably have a bit of a fling going
even this he has to ruin
the sidebar has a link (the TESCREAL one) which may also be illuminating
as to the rest, yuuuuuup. that's why sneerclub and techtakes exist.
it's ..... hairy
this is a prior attempt by me at giving a (very) concise overview of the "main camp" (for lack of a better term). the zizians are a distinct, specific, extremist offshoot of these.
and I want to make clear that "extremist" there is really, really intense. because 'ole Yud himself has advocated nuking datacenters to "stop the AI"
thiel's linked in by......many strands. it's pretty accurate to say that many aren't known, and only some are. some things that are: these ideas are extremely popular with a lot of the kind of people who work at thiel-funded/thiel-connected companies (palantir, etc etc). there's also a strong link/correlation between the sort of shit that both thiel/yarvin say, and many of these
don't feel bad for not getting it from the getgo, nor should you feel bad about not wanting to dive in. much of their shit spans 2~3 decades (even longer when you account for the extropians and longtermists and shit...), so there's a lot
HP finding new lows to get to with printers is honestly kind of impressive. depressing as fuck, but impressive. maybe this is how the sentient printers from Gawne's Old Guy verse start up
also, I was sent this earlier:
[wailing intensifies]
Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending Sunday 27 October 2024
Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending Sunday 18 August 2024
Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending Sunday 11 August 2024
Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending Sunday 30 June 2024
hot off the presses: automatic wrong information without even going to the wrong-information deliveries store
Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending Sunday 2 June 2024
In which folks once again don’t learn the same lesson as the last few times
History of (extremely predictable) failures catching up to you? Quick, write a book!