No, you’re wrong, the Traffic Light examples ARE specifically to gather data to train models.
No you're wrong, because the sites that embed those captchas on their page are not doing that to help good.
If people just wanted a good captcha they wouldn’t need hundreds of millions of photos of street lights and bicycles.
Yes, they are getting something productive out of the human labor that would be done anyways. Trust me as a web developer, and web scraper, some kind of captcha is necessary for many free services to be useful/economically viable. The core of a good captcha is just making it marginally more expensive for the scraper/bot than it is for you.
Aren’t these Captchas designed to get training data for AI models anyway?
Yes and no, the captchas are just meant to be hard for computers to solve but easier for humans. People saw that, and thought that "if we're making people do this might as well have them do something useful" not meant to be malevolent- and the purpose is still stopping bots, training them is a side-effect.
Just means they'll get harder, but maybe not for people, just needs to be harder for a computer
Depends on the case, sometimes its unavoidable.
Anybody else would have been rendered penniless within a year, tops.
Nobody else has ever been ordered to pay that much, much less in a suit for speech. Wrongful death lawsuits are awarded less than this.
Other people see the signs than the drivers, a lot of them I think are for kids to nag their parents
No that's more importantly because these are dogs not pandas
I'd say a big part of it is that drivers already filter out billboards, but those info signs often have important information on them that drivers are expected to read
I'd say a big part of it is that drivers already filter out billboards, but those info signs often have important information on them that drivers are expected to read
If the senate is abolished, states that joined on the basis of the senate should secede
You're just saying no learn the history of the world. That's not an argument, you need to point to your actual criticism specifically rather than a copout
What're you talking about? It's a function of global trade lol.
Water only exists as atoms. There is no non-discrete water, it is inherently in reality discrete.
Atoms of water are measured in moles. Atoms are discrete units, a mole is just a certain number of them
The real shower thought was about movement across the highest speed we know of at the minimum distance we know of, so I divided Planck length by the speed of light.
The Federal Trade Commission's losses have been consumers' wins.
It makes it clear the direction of movement and how the user has to position themselves so they can ride it without thinking about it- but it saves power from slowing down