ShoeThrower @ ShoeThrower @lemmy.zip Posts 0Comments 28Joined 5 days ago
LMAO. If you ignore the point I'm making in 3 consecutive comments, I'm going to assume you don't understand. You should take your own advice, you literally told me to go read about the riots!
And surely you've heard about about lemm.ee and slrpnk.net? No?
Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed
At a town hall meeting, Vidalia residents vigorously opposed the plan [to integrate schools], saying it would disrupt students’ lives and expose their children to drugs and violence.
Accepting the plan would have been a “death sentence” for the district, said Paul Nelson, a former Concordia superintendent. White families would have fled to private schools or other districts, said Nelson
“It’s time to move on,” said Nelson, who left the district in 2016. “Let’s start looking to build for the future, not looking back to what our grandparents may have gone through.”
Hmm... Something tells me it's not just something the grandparents went through...
Musk chooses who he gives money to. He's not going to give money to Bernie, who's currently rallying against oligarchs. Instead, he's going to give it to the people who are willing to push his fascist agenda. In the last election that was conservatives, but it's not like the liberals don't have freaks of their own. Money and advertising spend largely determines election outcomes, so by giving cash to politicians he likes, he can literally buy elections. Very few politicians would turn down his cash if offered, because they want the advantage it would bring. They also just have a fetish for sucking the toes of large donors.
So a reasonable government's actions on this situation would have been to heavily tax people/corporations with high number of houses.
Or, you know... Money?
Gun control does not always mean outright banning guns.
Do you think the Russian, Cuban, Chinese, and Parisian revolutionaries did not have or use guns?
What you're not understanding is that quashing a protest with force doesn't make the anger just go away.
Thankfully I don't think US authorities are anywhere close to PRC or Russia levels of force
The US is only trying to end Habeas Corpus, cracking down on free speech, personal and social freedoms, deploying military units in the streets, planting secret police in protests, and is currently kidnapping, disappearing, and sending people to foreign labor camps without trial while wearing masks and not giving any identifiable information... All while supporting and funding an ongoing internationally-recognized genocide.
Maybe you should be doing the reading...
People don't just instantly forget the moment after an event ends, especially now.
The point I was making, is that bringing in cops and the national guard to beat protesters does not restore order to a crisis caused by ICE kidnapping people. It is an escalation that will very likely be matched if CA hasn't totally forgotten their past. Which they haven't.
Not true. LAPD is not cuffing the immigrants, but they are defending ICE during the arrests and attacking protestors.
Yeah, we need more peaceful protesters to be attacked by cops and counter-protesters, then get blamed for the violence.
Or maybe the fascists will eventually just decide to stop, all on their own...
Not true. LAPD is not cuffing the immigrants, but they are defending ICE during the arrests and attacking protestors.
I don't mean literal nukes, but they would probably declare an emergency and send in substantial military force.
Edit: It's crazy that we live in a time where I have to be specific about this.
DC would nuke LA.
OK, but put simply, police forces exist to enforce laws, military forces exist to kill enemies. This is why there are laws to prevent military forces from being deployed domestically. Their jobs are very different, and neither is truly qualified to do the job of the other.
Only the OP and top level comment.
Silly me, socialism is sooo globally fashionable!
Fixed it.
Ok?
The US Military didn't decide to invade Iraq because they wanted to do good deeds, but that doesn't mean you didn't also aid some people along the way. The US Forces invaded over lies and caused mass death and destruction in exchange for political power and money. It wasn't a war for a good cause, and lead to increased extremism in the Middle East.
Back to the original topic: I generally agree, but am only pessimistic about their numbers and ability to actually resist.
There's also a part that says freedom of speech, right to a fair trial, freedom from unreasonable search & seizures, right to asylum...
How's that going?
LAPD is already assisting ICE, so take a guess.
Of all the things you could rightly criticize as cowardly actions, brazenly deploying a military force against a civilian population, is not among them.