RedditWanderer @ RedditWanderer @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

1,914

Joined

2 yr. ago

We've been cancelling/postponing plans to visit the US since 2016. May never see it again at this pace. I'm sure america doesn't need tourists anyway

Must be my app. I can't click the post, but i think you're right has nothing to do with your link

Says page not found now

The SS is a nice touch

At leastbMaple syrup. A tiny amount is made in vermont.

This is also the mentality we should adopt in general. In the world we live in, having way way more than you need should be seen as extremely shameful. They should be afraid.

Only gonna be a bad time for the peasants! The nobles will make a killing.

It's not a coincidence the "older" models don't qualify for credits.

Statham wasn't the worst actor in that movie, and I hated the dumb cops and "political stakes" way more than the beekeeper plot. Also Statham can still move without 57 jump cuts.

C+ tier plane movie.

Thank fuck. I'm still keeping my 2013 civic forever.

It's going to be tough, but good changes for the world overall. Enough with the post-ww2 power dynamics. I'm hoping Canada will be pushed to rely less on the U.S

My comment does not say jury nullification shouldn't exist/be allowed. It says the opposite.

Unpopular take but despite it being a popular thing, we want jury nullification to come from individual conclusions that this law does not apply despite the circumstances, and not because they know they can. Every study ever has shown that people who know about jury nullification tend to dismiss evidence more often, and are more easily deceived by a sympathetic/ non-sympathetic looking defendant. It's not even a law, it's the result of the fact juries can't be prosecuted for their decisions so really they can do whatever they want. This is enough to know that technically you can "nullify the law". That goes both ways, people can convict without evidence

Saying the law doesn't actually apply despite the person having done the thing the law says not to do is very different from saying the punishment should be nil. This could also keep you from ever serving on a jury and telling others about this in certain circumstances could be a crime. All the legal minds who looked into this agree it should still remain a thing, but it shouldn't be told to jurors explicitly. When you serve you swear to uphold the law, so it's tricky to nullify without purgery perjury except for very very special cases.

This is not a good YSK, you should understand what the law is as a juror. You could in theory reword this entire post without actually using the term and that would probably be helpful, but super complicated to write.

Esit: I'm team Luigi (in mario kart of course)

Not just him, but they found his wife and dog dead too.

A mix of cognitive bias and systemic racism

But also stereotypes exists and can be true to some degree, often just cultural

Can't use their logic against them, they don't have any. They just said that to get what they wanted, and theyre going to keep making things up to attack other people just because theyre not happy on the inside.

The worst part is, attacking other people doesn't actually make them happy on the inside, just on the outside.

I tried finishing smash on switch once. Holy balls when you think it's over...

And I hope the world will remember

You guys are sleeping every day?

I wouldn't be surprised baby kingshit wakes up tomorrow has a fit, renames yosemite to america national park and threatens to remove citizenship from anyone who dare use the flag this way.

I'm surprised he didnt already do it for those who kneel during the anthem