He switched to linux a while ago, and went down the rabbit hole from there. His most recent video is about self hosting Nextcloud and Vaultwarden in order to ditch google services.
The panic screen gives me a QR code containing the last few pages of journalctl. Something about amdgpu.
I haven't looked into it yet. It's only been occuring after my system sleeps over night, meaning when I sit down to use my PC and it happens, I'm not in a mood to start tinkering first thing, so I've just been rebooting and getting on with my day.
Didn't happen when I went to wake my machine just now though.
It's an official EU citizens initiative, hosted on the EU web portal. The one maintained by the EU for the very purpose of digitally facilitating any and all citizens initiatives.
I... What? Is that not a mutual exclusivity argument? For you to have a point, this time and effort would need to be better spent elsewhere. I not only disagree with that, but I have the time and energy to do the other things you are claiming will make a difference.
Citizens iniatives may be a form of petition, but the difference is they come with actual legal requirements.
This isn't some change.org bs, a list of names totaling some arbitrary number. That's why it has a hard deadline. And requirements for how signatures have to come from more than one country.
This is a pre-existing system for the people of the EU to force it to tackle an issue. Most EU countries have equivalent systems locally, as well. This isn't new or unusual for us.
Legal precedent is how the US works. Where lawsuits catalyzing the setting of new standards for what is legal, is the most common way the law changes. If you thought that's how EU legislation got done, then you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Almost everything the EU does, is based on proposals. Not legal cases.
Those can happen in the EU, too, but we have additional ways to propose law as citizens, and legal cases are more common on the national level, rather than the continental level.
If you can gather proof (signatures) of concern on a given issue, you can force a proposal through the door that normally has to come from elected representatives.
Right. Because caring about A means you can't care about B. If you support legislation, you must be boycoting nothing, because no-one in the history of existence has ever done both.
You're claiming mutual exclusivity where none exists.
You sound more like you're scared of the implications of this passing, because you'd have us voting with out wallets rather than... actually voting. Nevermind that even games not worth buying should still also be preserved.
Pre-orders, micro-transactions and battle-passes are still a thing, no matter how much we've shouted about "big company bad". This type of crap isn't something we solve by any one method alone.
And you don't need to engage with youtube or any other social media, to accept that the phenomenon they enable, occur. To dismiss that reality would be idiotic delusion.
Millions of views is a lot, when all you need to get started, is one of those millions to sign a petition.
We have equivalently signs here in finland, though often you'll see bike paths marked by simple painted bikes on the ground. In recent years I've started seeing it designated by a red colored pavement. These are nice, but really curbs seem to be the only thing that reliably separates bikes and pedestrians.
We also have "pedestrian zones/roads" marked by these signs.
The sign is deceptive, as they actually mean that bikes are explicitly allowed. The signs designate squares and wide areas where cars are NOT allowed.
Botting something like a citizens initiative, where every signature WILL get scrutinized by government would be seriously stupid. Or are you saying commenters like me are bots?
Is it really that hard for you to imagine the possibility... that people care?
Or are just not aware of the chain of youtubers doing a call to arms on this, getting millions of views, completely explaining the signature spike?
Unless they were looking, they wont have seen it. And as far as I know, just the cursor being active sends the "typing" indicator in some apps. When I see it for just a second I just assume someone hovered over the chatbox for a bit.
No-one thinks it's weird for it to pop up for a second and then go away. Or for it to appear for a good while and still not get you a message. Sometimes I'll write a first draft of a response right away, then leave it there for hours while I think about it some more, before finalizing it.
It would be smart if chat apps implemented a minimum, where "typing" won't apper until you're three words into writing a response or something.
That way it wont go off over nothing. It's still useful, it lets you/them know whether you're getting/giving an immediate response, so you/they know whether the conversion is continuing right away, or later.
TFW after your latest killing spree but it was just an oopsiewoopsy