Hugohase @ Hugohase @startrek.website

Posts

29

Comments

65

Joined

1 yr. ago

Yes for Sulfur derivates and nitrous oxigens but no for CO2. The biggest contributord to CO2 emissions are electricity production and traffic.

Its really easy to find this sources but I really dont know what you want to know. Maybe about being expensive? Slow?. There is literally tons of material out there... The other guy took the one thing that could maybe be argued about, CO2 emissions.

I only accept data that supports my worldview is a nice argument. Have fun not learning stuff.

Sometimed I am astonished that people post in a forum without being able to comprehend text

We find that larger-scale national nuclear attachments do not tend to associate with significantly lower carbon emissions while renewables do.

I am sorry, but reality says otherwise. And SMRs are vaporware, if ever realized likely more expensive than already expensive NPPs.

Slow, expensive, more carbon emissions than renewables. Either nuclear weapon proliferation or corruption, there is no other reason to build reactors...

Edit: One of many, many, many sources

I think both. But either way, I am fine.

Nice example of a false equivalency...

AbEr eS kÖnNTe noCH wEniGer SeiN 🤓