Bigfishbest @ Bigfishbest @lemmy.world Posts 0Comments 8Joined 3 mo. ago
Yes, not disputing the veracity of these, I have better things to do with my time, but putting them in context would be honest. Divide these cases on the number of congregations and present to me whether faith based groups have a higher or lower number of such abuses as compared to society at large. That would indicate whether there is a correlation or not.
I'm sure we can dig up similar stories from sports and conclude that sports is just as evil. On the other hand millions of children enjoy sports and never experience abuse (thank gods), and likewise, millions of faithful people are encouraged by their faith to do good and don't abuse anyone.
Now there is an element in many faiths of trusting people who wield social power and such human groups are often attractive to abusive personalities, who seek that power, for the sake of their own personal goals and desires.
A final note, your own mental development shapes how you think of God. A child thinks he's a man with a beard in the sky. A philosopher may think of the divine as a personal or unpersonal force of good. I find it very hard to understand how someone who believes in a life after death, where wickedness gets punished for eternity, can commit child abuse. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, I just can't fathom why someone who truly believes in judgment can set themselves up like that. They must either not believe and merely use the trappings of religion as said above, or do believe, but be persons suffering from the most cognitive dissonance generating defective programming imagineable.
I dunno, it's Friday and I'm in a mood, but religion (not organized) makes me try to do good to all my fellow humans.
Where is this from?
Whiskey on the Rocks. Hilarious Swedish historical satire. It's probably better for those who understand Swedish, but I'd still recommend it. Castlveania Nocturne S2.
Discovered something fun this week, in Norwegian the word for employer is "work-giver", but a bit of digging revealed that the alternative "work-buyer" existed but went out of use. I think people would sell their time and labor for more if the wording more clearly revealed the actual relationship.
Ancient Rome had privatized fire department. Caesar's friend Crassus got the job and used it to extort people to sell their homes in a neighborhood when a fire broke out. As a result he became one of the richest people in history. He was also killed by the Persians who poured liquid gold (or silver, depending on source) on his decapitated head and sent it back to Rome.
The share value of UHC fell hard after the murder. That is the thing that really makes waves. As you say, losing CEO is costly, to investors and owners, which in the end is what matters most to the owner classes.
(edit typo)
"They wouldn't hurt us, we're their workforce."
The anti internet internet community. Where do I sign in? Or out?