They want to have a splashy "TEST ROCKET EXPLOSION!!!!!!!" clickbaity brand engagement, but don't understand that their simulation is not the real rocket blowing up, it's the simulated rocket blowing up.
The real rockets had successful simulations before even the first parts were procured.
Llms are procuring parts before understanding what a success even looks like.
So, you keep saying money this, money that, and I 100% agree that money makes everything political.
Science is not inherently political until you bring money into it, which is why well funded, independent and public research institutions are such a benefit. And why threatening the operating capital of those researchers like we have here is such an insult. They don't care about these squabbles.
The people that learn enough about a subject to publish their own research
Who gets the opportunity to become an expert?
The people that learn enough about a subject to publish their own research
What are the experts taught at school?
The research that other experts have published
Who picks the experts?
You just rephrased your first one here, so the answer is still "the people that learn enough about a subject to publish their own research" ie peer review.
If you were actually trying to ask, who gets to become a PAID expert, the answer to that question is the people with money.
Many people who identify as left wing, but who did not voice a position to the electors in the 2024 election, adopted a strategy of playing chicken with fascism. If we can get enough public outcry against Kamala, they said, then the Democrats will just have to replace her with a lefty like AOC.
I got this in school, it happens. Or happened in the 90s.