Reddit will begin charging for access to its API

techcrunch.com Reddit will begin charging for access to its API

Reddit says that it'll begin charging certain developers and organizations for access to its user-generated content.

Not sure how that will affect libreddit or teddit. That'd would prevent me to get some news on specific channels, which when interesting enough, I brought to lemmy, :)

Reddit Wants to Get Paid for Helping to Teach Big A.I. Systems

Privacy @lemmy.ml

2y ago

Reddit will begin charging for access to its API

techcrunch.com /2023/04/18/reddit-will-begin-charging-for-access-to-its-api

24 4

You're viewing a single thread.

77 comments

Reading through, it makes sense unlike Twitter's policy change. Why should tech giants have access to Reddit's API on Reddit's dime at no benefit to Reddit or Reddit's users? As long as users are able to keep running bots and alternative apps, I don't see a problem. I just hope that they would allow free academic licenses.
- The thing is whether privacy oriented frontends will be requested to pay or not. Cause one of the ways to detect whether one is a regular user, or something else, might be user accesses or requests. A frontend instance is in fact a 3rd party, and most probably will be detected as such, therefore privacy oriented frontends will vanish, as the ones for twitter did, right?
  
  What's up with this comment? It's not deleted or removed, but it has no content.
  
  I'm wondering if they posted an invisible character just to fool us.
- Reddit could add anti-bot restrictions, but they don't, because bots drive up their "engagement" numbers. This is entirely two-faced. They essentially just want to make some money off of something they already see as benefitting them.
  
  I was thinking specifically of bots that are associated with a community, like moderation aids or Wheel of Time's Lews Therin quote bot. I'm not sure the bots you're thinking of actually do increase engagement numbers if they can be detected. Advertisers are only interested in human eyeballs.
  
  Advertisers are only interested in human eyeballs.
  Very true, but this reveals the conflicts of interest between these social media companies, and the advertisers they sell space to. They want to say to advertisers: buy an ad on our site, it will reach thousands of real people! See all this activity! When in reality a lot of that activity is bot generated.
  Both advertisers and users want to reach and talk to real people, but it's in these social media companies interest to inflate their numbers and fake engagement any way they can.
  This isn't a small problem either, I've heard it said that half of all tweets, and a good percentage of youtube comments are from bots.
  
  It's even a reason for those companies not to sell "no advertisement" subscriptions to their users. Reddit could offer something like that, but it would mean to lose the most valuable eyeballs (which belong to the humans who can afford to pay for not seeing ads) when it comes to marketing the website to advertisers.

77 comments