vampire rule

Why do people censor fuck or other profanity on the internet? I don't get it, and until now, I've been too afraid to ask.
- Murica. Dunno if any other country does censor such trivialities too. And to the deeper why: religious hipocrisy i guess.
  
  Afaik tiktok also heavily censors topics that are considered bad publicity or whatever. In fact, considering that this self-censor trend (edit: this type of self censor trend that utilizes cutting out vowels instead of using euphemisms or not using the words at all) is much much younger than YouTube or Instagram (at least I noticed it only a few months, maybe one or two years ago) I'd say the American companies weren't even the driving force behind it.
- Better yet: Why do such a pathetic job doing it?
- Lemmy is bizarrely fond of useless censorship, and I think it's because .ml has a bunch of filters. Which is hilarious. Yes folks, we expect to reach a stateless society with no firm hierarchy, and all boundaries decided by the people. The admin has decided you may not say fuck.
  
  I think its because most of the content is reposted from other places where censoring is the norm.
- I don’t fucking k***.
- It's like drinking with brown paper bag censoring. Everybody knows what's going on and it's pointless. So f*ck it. ;)
  
  Exactly! But when did it become the cool thing to do?
- Because not everyone is comfortable with swears
  
  Fuck the fucking fuckers. Swearing as much a part of human communication as cadence is.
  Puritans can fuck themselves with a pineapple. It's as ridiculous as finding full stops offensive and insisting the rest of the world bow to them by using double commas or something.
  
  Except no one sees the censored thing and doesn't think the word itself. If anything the censor is bringing extra attention to it. It's dumb. If the person posting is scared of the word, they should leave it out. If they're worried other people might fear it then either they should leave it out or not bother censoring because they see it anyway.
  
  clutches pearl necklace
  Ew. Anyone got a Kleenex?
  
  I understand that and I prefer to not swear most of the time as well. But these "I'll leave out the vowels" edits don't change the number of swearwords in the sentence.
  
  Fuck em, if they're that thinskinned they're never gonna be happy
  
  Yeah and this puritanical bullshit sends us all tumbling down a slippery slope until it's offensive to teach children anatomy words like penis and vagina. Hmm, and one wonders why practicing christian families have a higher instance of unreported CSA 🤔
- because it actually adds comedic value to some, like me. it's somehow funnier if you sloppily censor fuck? i can't explain it but yesh, if you don't think of it like that it'll be pretty cringe

You CAN in fact more or less do this for real: photographing a mirror from a straight on perspective without the camera visible.
https://youtu.be/ZlaeWRMYwGg?feature=shared
Basically, you need a special tilt-shift lens that distorts perspective to where it looks ‘straight on’ while the camera is actually off to the side or down below. If you do it correctly, the viewer won’t even notice anything’s missing.
These lenses are primarily used for architecture photography to prevent ‘leaning buildings’. They can also create really cool miniature effects. It’s quite a useful bit of gear, but also rather expensive because it’s such a niche lens.
- If someone is like me and goes: "Want!": That Lens in the video costs a cool ~1000 Bucks.
  Which doesn't mean I don't want it anymore... Just that it's on the list for when I swim in money for some reason :D
  
  The one in the video is a Canon TS-E 90 - that's a 1000 bucks USED. And that's not really what you want if you're going to be doing landscape stuff. You want the TS-E 24 for a much wider field of view. Those are even more expensive.
  You CAN however buy cheaper, new lenses. Brands like Laowa and Samyang produce tilt-shifts that cost less than half of what a Canon costs if you really want a new example.
  That said though... anything in photography is expensive anyway, and these are niche lenses. They do some things that other lenses really can't, like this magic trick. And while you can replicate some of its effect digitally - like the miniature effect - the best way to do things like that is always in camera. If you take a good shot to start with, you'll alsways have a better end result.
  I'm personally looking to buy a TS-E 24 one of these days, assuming I find a gently used - and gently priced - example.
- I've actually always wondered about this, thanks!
- Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
  https://piped.video/ZlaeWRMYwGg?feature=shared
  Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
  I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
- cool miniature effects
  My favorite example is the intro to Dollhouse. Now I need to rewatch that show.
- Also, you can use a telephoto lens, like from that little bush you can see in the center if you zoom in (not that anybody sensible would bother)

The reflection doesn't match what's in front of the mirror, so they probably just edited in a different picture
- You're probably correct, this reflection definitely looks odd. But something to consider is that the mirror is likely leaning back, and depending on your angle to it it may not show you whats directly in front of it but show things further out in way that could explain the weirdness.
  
  Look at the path. It goes directly to the base of the mirror from the 'other' side, but you can't see it at all on 'this' side. You're not telling me that's not edited. Even if there's some optical illusion shit going on and the mirror is actually leaning back much more than it appears, this would still imply that the path goes directly towards some random wall and then just ends, or at least makes a very sharp turn, at most 0.5 meter in front of it? Why would it do that?
- Or it's an undisclosed AI generated image, that seems more likely to me than any other source
- At first, I thought it was a painting. Everything is warped and blurred just a little bit. Almost impressionist like.

How the f##k was this photographed
Vampire
- With accompanying vampire camera
  
  And vampire sidewalk
  
  Vampire with neuralink

Party pooper train coming through - chooo chooo
Notice the path in the mirror does not match up with the ground - no path below the mirror

from the other side

😂 Reminds me of this old thread https://web.archive.org/web/20170806233157/https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/cmwov/hey_reddit_what_tattoos_do_you_have/c0tpyls/
- lol I knew the thread before clicking.
  I hate that they ruined my favorite website.

It says in the image, it's a fae portal not a mirror.

It's very easy to do this in Photoshop now. Literally two clicks.
- True but I think I remember seeing this photo around 2013 or so. Granted I could do this in Photoshop back then as well, but I worth mentioning
  
  You worth mentioning indeed <3

There's something about using the same sort of lenses that allow tilt shift. You just shift the lense to the side. Idk how to explain because I only sort of understand it and am not a photographer.

nobody knows my mbin account.