Skip Navigation

The world's corporations produce so much climate change pollution, it could eat up about 44% of their profits if they had to pay damages for it

phys.org Study reveals how much carbon damage would cost corporations if they paid for their emissions

The world's corporations produce so much climate change pollution, it could eat up about 44% of their profits if they had to pay damages for it, according to a study by economists of nearly 15,000 public companies.

Study reveals how much carbon damage would cost corporations if they paid for their emissions
81

You're viewing a single thread.

81 comments
  • Fossil fuels are the main actors in this. Corporations can only use the energy we provide them with.

    Fossil fuel producers will never pay damages for climate change due to political donations. You may get the odd instance now and again, where there is selective scapegoating and that will be that. The tobacco industry (AFAIK) has never paid for the damages they have caused. They poured billions into politics and offset the argument against them for decades. Fossil fuel companies are doing exactly the same thing.

    So rather than finger point towards specific actors, we should be sorting our political systems out. Political donations need to be banned. Campaigns should only be allowed to run through a single channel that is funded by the country. All other types of political advertising should be stopped. It is well known that the most successful campaigns have a price tag attached. Therefore it is easy to buy votes with campaigns. Moreso in a FPTP system. While we allow political donations we will never stop egregious profiteering without consequences.

    • People need to make a conscious effort to buy less shit. It's easy to blame corpos but we create that demand.

      If it doesn't solve a problem you have, you don't need it.

      • Or we could create enough green energy to satisfy that demand. I totally agree that we have a social problem with greed. This is not something any government will fix because more taxes makes their live easier. Fight the battles you can win, not the ones you can't.

        • We don't have time to spin up enough infrastructure to match current production with renewable energy. Consumption must come down until then, and only scale up once the new infrastructure can handle it.

          • Not according to some.

            No you cannot do it overnight, but it will never happen at if we do not start. The first step is to stop giving money to fossil fuel companies so they can gouge us further with higher priced energy.

    • Several companies have faced criticism for their environmental practices over the years. Here are some sectors and notable companies that have been highlighted for their environmental impact or poor environmental practices:

      1 Fossil Fuel Industry:

      This sector is the most significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. Major companies in this sector have historically downplayed or denied their role in climate change.

      ExxonMobil: Accused of knowing about climate change as early as the 1970s but funding climate change denial for years.

      Chevron, BP, Shell: All have faced criticism for their contributions to global CO2 emissions.

      2 Mining:

      Mining can lead to deforestation, habitat destruction, and water pollution.

      Vale and BHP Billiton: Responsible for the Mariana dam disaster in Brazil in 2015.

      Glencore: Faced allegations of polluting rivers and not handling toxic waste appropriately.

      3 Fashion:

      The fashion industry, especially fast fashion, is a major polluter due to its high water usage, waste, and carbon emissions.

      H&M, Zara, and Forever 21: All have been criticized for promoting fast fashion, leading to enormous waste and questionable labor practices.

      4 Agriculture:

      Large-scale farming, especially meat and dairy production, contributes to deforestation, water consumption, and methane emissions.

      Tyson Foods, JBS, and Cargill: Significant contributors to global methane emissions due to their meat production.

      5 Technology:

      While tech companies often promote sustainability, some have been criticized for their environmental impact.

      Apple: Previously criticized for not making products that are easily repairable or recyclable, though they've made significant strides in recent years.

      Amazon: Criticized for excessive packaging and its carbon footprint from deliveries, though it has also made pledges to become carbon neutral.

      6 Automotive:

      Many car companies have historically relied on fossil fuels, contributing to CO2 emissions.

      Volkswagen: Caught in a major scandal for cheating emissions tests in 2015.

      7 Palm Oil Producers:

      Palm oil production has led to significant deforestation, especially in Indonesia and Malaysia.

      Companies like Nestlé, Unilever, and Procter & Gamble have faced scrutiny for not ensuring their palm oil is sustainably sourced, though many have made commitments to improve.

      8 Plastics and Packaging:

      Companies that heavily rely on single-use plastics contribute to plastic pollution.

      Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Nestlé: Have been named among the top plastic polluters several times in global audits.

      • I don't see your point. This does not alleviate the problem of political protections for party donors.

You've viewed 81 comments.