Protesters Gather Outside OpenAI Headquarters after Policy Against Military Use is Quietly Removed
Protesters Gather Outside OpenAI Headquarters after Policy Against Military Use is Quietly Removed
Protesters at OpenAI’s office demanded the startup cease military work. But first...
Protesters Gather Outside OpenAI Headquarters after Policy Against Military Use is Quietly Removed::Protesters at OpenAI’s office demanded the startup cease military work. But first...
You're viewing a single thread.
Such tech massively helps with munitions operating properly in a heavily jammed environment as you don't have a human live-guiding them like we see with the FPV drones Ukraine is using to defend themselves. Currently you can tell munitions autonomously to go to GPS location and/or look for something that has a certain shape (say, a tank) and explode it. However, this works less well for humans as humans generally have the same shape civilian or not. Being able to tell a munition to 'look in this GPS box for a munitions dump, a soldier in a trench, or a logistics truck and explode it' would be quite powerful; particularly if combined with mass waves of inexpensive ordinances.
What could possibly go wrong?
What could possibly go wrong?
A short film, Slaughter Bots.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Metalhead?
“I had a drone and I accidentally the whole thing. Is that bad? Should I call someone to help?”