[article] Nearly half of the U.S. population has diabetes or prediabetes—and many have no clue. Are you among them?

Combine:

urban layouts that are made to dissuade walking or cycling anywhere (thanks to automobile manufacturer lobbying),
along with poor food health guidelines,
along with corporate shrinkflation and reduction of quality ingredients in favour of fats and empty carbs.
along with a piss-poor healthcare system that dissuades preventative checks and treatments

and you've got an American obesity epidemic.

And transnational corporations developing and heavily marketing intentionally addictive junk food, especially to children.
Also it's not just American.
- No, but America is really good at exporting its sickness to other countries.
- I'm not giving Canada a pass, many of these are present here, but the U.S. is the only developed country that matches ALL of the above.
Plus, sugar became so ubiquitous that its in everything. People consume more than they might think. Nearly every big brand food has sugar from breads, to frozen meals, and of course loaded into various drinks.
- I wondered why Europeans kept calling American bread cake until I looked at the ingredients on your average pseudo-wheat loaf of bread.
  High fructose corn syrup is like the third ingredient. Followed closely by "cellulose filler," aka, sawdust.
- Sugar doesn't cause diabetes. Diabetes affects your ability to process sugar but sugar is not the cause.
fwiw, car usage may be related to elevated "fast food" consumption.
less cars, less drive-thrus, less McOzempic

The age of soda likely has a larger effect.

a car sympathizer... disgusting

How would diabetes and the age of cars link in any way?

how wouldn't it?
- ?
  Explain the connection to a vehicle using an internal combustion engine (or a battery pack) and someone with diabetes. Because I don't see any connection.

Okay so for the person indicating cars, sure you can make a casual link to the two. But that misses the major point here.

Type 2 diabetes, which is the type we're talking about here with this article so I'm strictly sticking to just Type 2, is primarily caused by obesity which is the primary factor that leads to diabetes.

This is because of a combination of abdominal and intra-abdominal fat distribution AND increased intrahepatic and intramuscular triglyceride content. These two factors conspire to increase insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction. So anything that leads to this kind of situation needs to be addressed, which gets to my point. We could literally list dozens of various things that contribute to this kind of situation, there's no ONE factor that just predominately contributes in meaningful ways more so than any other outside of diet and physical activity.

While cars have indeed contributed to a decline in physical activity it is important to remember that diet also plays a role in this. I'm not disagreeing with anyone here about cars contributing to the issue. But anywhere I go, I always remind folks that it is always diet AND physical activity. If this was fucksoda or something, I would still remind them that diet is indeed important but we must remember that it is diet AND physical activity.

I know it sounds pedantic, but given the strong message that all health agencies the world over have given, we need to always remember that it is both diet and physical activity that play a role in diabetes and prediabetes.

Wonder if this shift corresponds to the age of automobiles

So yes, I would agree that physical activity has decreased but also diets have become absolute trash at the same time. We absolutely should address the lack of physical activity along with encouraging better diets. Given how important health agencies have linked the two, I just think it would be a miss if we just solely spoke on JUST the physical activity.

Type 2 diabetes, which is the type we're talking about here with this article so I'm strictly sticking to just Type 2, is primarily caused by obesity which is the primary factor that leads to diabetes.
Just for anyone watching who might smugly think "yeah, but I'm not fat," like I did before I discovered my prediabetes: you don't have to be fat - I'm not, I'm thin. I work for a living, light physical labor, but constant. I cut sugared drinks out of my life in over 20 years ago and I am what I considered to be a "relatively healthy" eater, maintaining about a 60-40 ratio between raw vegetable intake and animal protein in my meals.
But I developed a bit of a sweet tooth in the past few years. I make ice cream as a hobby, and while I never eat a whole pint, I might eat two or three tablespoons a day. I paid no attention to what kind of carbs I was eating, whole grains never really crossed my mind. And I have a bowl of my favorite candies, which I got in the habit of rewarding myself with at the end of every day - one or two. Or three. After all, I didn't figure I was a candidate.
Ah, but I was. Shocked the crap out of me, tbh.
Still, 3 months of healthy eating and cutting out all of those bad habits was enough to course correct for me. I am no longer prediabetic. My message is this: refined sugar is poison. Try and eat whole foods and when it comes to sugar, moderate yourself accordingly - particularly as you get older.
I just think it would be a miss if we just solely spoke on JUST the physical activity.
head on over to fucksoda for that dialogue. this is fuckcars

As someone with prediabetes, no, not really. The kind of exercise that helps prevent and mitigate high blood sugar levels isn't continuous exertions like walking or cycling. It's more like running up stairs. So if you want to blame elevators...

Well, still don't. It's a dietary problem, not an exercise problem. Otherwise I, a lifelong bike commuter who always takes the stairs and doesn't sit down at work, wouldn't be prediabetic.

A quick search says cycling lowers the risk by 20% (whatever that means). Gears probably really help here, allowing you to have more resistance with your highest comfortable cadence so you can do cardio.
Either way I don't think the point is that it is a foolproof prevention (because other factors), but more that the same diet but fully sedentary would likely be worse off. Particularly with the obesity aspect, cycling obviously burns calories and builds muscle (which will raise metabolism) so can help you lose weight in the long run. More is probably better so long as you aren't really overdoing it or getting injured.
What if I told you those who own a car are more likely to eat fast food/make poor diet choices?
https://open.bu.edu/bitstream/handle/2144/40250/Fast%20Food-and-SES-EHB-%20Revised_2.pdf
- Well they already made one really bad choice, so I'd say it checks out!

I have no clue ¯(ツ)/¯

You seem fine to me.

ITT: people who have no idea what causes diabetes

what causes diabetes my lemmy?
- https://nutritionfacts.org/video/what-causes-diabetes/
  Don't believe it? Click "Sources cited."

The trail near me closed in both directions (2 bridges being replaced+resurfacing) for 6months+ (no estimate other than "early 2024"). By now I'm pretty sure I lost any benefit I had built up on my ebike (131 miles, that's with 250w assist but also gears).

So maybee (voice from Worthikids animation "Free Apple" at 2:15).

Also can you imagine a highway closing here in summer and the estimate being "I don't know, next year sometime"? Looking it up, it seems highway closures (for a road bridge) are around a month. And given the listed detours they probably don't just do it as one bulk closing that cuts off multiple potential routes at the same time. Goes to show the priority I guess.

Diabetes has been essentially cured, and no one gives a fuck because it isn't a pill or an injection. T2D can be completely reversed through nothing more than diet. But because the required diet (that results in healthy humans whether or not they have diabetes) indicates a cessation of the daily, mindless, cruel and violent abuse of animals for food, people don't give one fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck.