...

"I'll take care of us" proceeds to force the wife to take care of his every need
Nonsense. We'll just hire a maid, a cook, a stable-hand, a small battalion of guards, and a priest to propagandize them all into thinking this is normal and good.
You just sit around making babies and I'll be out hunting, soldiering, raping, and looting my way through the adjacent neighborhood.
If these women of the past were so happy being under the thumb on their husbands, why did they keep on rebelling, eventually even willing to put their lives on the line to gain freedom?
Obviously, this never happened. Happiness during the late Medieval Era was extremely high, because everyone was perfectly aligned with their gender and social roles. It was a utopia that was only ruined by the damned liberalism of the Enlightenment Era.
Finally, someone said it. On a scale, marriage is practically parasitical to the extent where men are culturally discouraged from taking care of themselves because they can always turn their gf/wife into 'the help' and do all the shitty work they think they're too good for. It's even worse if you're like me and of
descent. Nothing like getting called gay by a cousin for helping out with cleaning up during the holidays (I mean he's half-right
, but still.)
- Little depressed me more than learning the amount of housework the average husband does actually decreases after the first child is born.
- During the holidays I’d ask the women if they need me to do anything. They tell me no, I don’t know how to do anything. Then I turn around and their husbands are nowhere near the kitchen and just drinking and watching football in the living room.
- Finally, someone said
  I don't want to womansplain to you. But women HAVE been saying this shit since the written language, it's like half of feminist literature.
Return to tradition... Of wives poisoning their husbands hehe

inside your racist uncle there are two wolves

What is it with CHUDs and the whole massive tit thing? CHUDs are still humans at the end of the day so of course they'd be into T&A, even if some like the former more than the latter, but CHUDS consistently have massive tits in their fantasies and ass is left on the backburner. At least CHUD's obsession with super attractive, musclebound men is explainable because CHUD men think they ARE supermodels.
I mean, I'm not complaining considering that it's an improvement from drooling over actually 1000 year old dragons. But I find it weird from people who claim that sex and the body are two super evil things. Even CHUD women get in on it with Meloni's obsession with anime girls groping each other.
- I think the point is to emphasize that a woman is ONLY an object to them. By showing a woman with comically large boobs, the point is to emphasize that women are fundamentally unequal with men. They exist to be eye candy and nothing more.
- "Big boobies to feed my strong superior warrior children"

"retvrn to tradition" mfs try not to be into body proportions almost unattainable without plastic surgery challenge (impossible)

In the reeducation camps for chuds they'll have wojak dolls for them to play with.

aww she's holding a baby

owned so hard they were taken to the shadow realm

Next time I see a meme like this, I'm saying that word for word.

Why's she hiding two bald men under her apron?

At my heaviest with DD's I never had to use an arm to keep them up, much less both. On an actual human those would be at least F cups.

Even in their weird fantasies they won't admit that her tits would sag down to her belly button if they became that big from multiple pregnancies.

What's wrong with playing with dolls

Nothing, unless they're wojaks and not dolls

Did they misspell "wojak" or are they trying to make "woke-jaks" a thing?

No, a wokjak is just a wojak who's eating Chinese food.

Jokes aside right wingers do have a large recruitable population from angsty incels and all that. If I weren't connected to China I might've ended up as one of them. I should make a post about this tomorrow.

I was talking about something related to this with a friend earlier. These are their words:
There's a crisis in masculinity, particularly in service-led western economies. Late stage capitalism doesn't have a clearly defined role for males. The image of a gruff beer-lad footie fan; the manual family bread winner; it no longer relevant or compatible in the time we're in. There's little opportunity for expression; society is struggling to figure out the 'third spaces' that replace pubs and sports clubs. There's a mental health crisis amongst males. They're defensively edgy because the alternative is poked fun at. It's a societal gender-norm dogma that needs demolishing. I think progress is being made, but it's slow.
The context for this was how boring men's fashion is. How every single store is 90% women's fashion and 10% men's section is various cargo pants and shades of beige plus some lumberjack shirts.
The way men are forced to express themselves, not allowed to being very physical/touchy, not allowed to have emotions, etc etc. These things are no longer offset by the previous benefits of patriarchy they had, which made up for them.
One of the ways this contradiction is resolving itself is the emergence of "feminine" men through femboys and the like. But it's slow moving and I'd like to see it transition to just an outright normalisation of more creative fashion, more emotions and more touchy without the overt sexualisation involved or the dodgy age-based aesthetic (there's no old femboys).

Where are the cars going to park