this technology suffers from high latency

Strap 20 sd card with 1TB capacity each. Send the pidgeon to a neighboring city, 2 hours flight time.
Bandwidth: 2.78 GB/s (assuming no wild hawks in the area)
- "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway."
- When "packet loss" occurs:
  This little maneuver is gonna cost us 51 years
- high speed low drag
  
  Not until I use my... dragnet
- You are forgetting the time it takes to copy the data to and from these cards. Data may be transported, but it is not usable until you copy it. Copying 20 TiB is probaply going to take some time
  
  Fastest SD card has ~300MB/s read speed and ~250MB/s write speed. Assuming you can write to those cards in parallel, that means you'll need an additional one hour to write the data to the SD cards and another one hour to read them back. So 4 hours in total which halves the data rates to 1.39 GB/s.
  That's assuming the card can actually sustain ~250MB/s write speed during the full 1TB copy. It probably can if the card is freshly formatted but I haven't actually tested it myself.
  
  you have the same problem with downloads though. In the end any download rate exceeding your disc write speed doesnt get you there faster.
  ofc. you can write as you download, which makes things faster.
- MicroSD cards are better, here. They're 250mg; a pigeon can transport 75g. That's 300 microSD cards, ignoring the weight of the SD card enclosure.
- That's a terrible ping 😂
- We had a TV report about a photographer who actually transfered big files with via horse because the transfer over the internet was slower than a calm ride. (Germany - 2021) link for Germans

When Baldur's Gate 3 came out our group of friends wanted to start a game together. Since one of our friends, living about a kilometer away, has shitty internet it was faster for me to download the game myself, copy it to a USB stick, have it driven over by another friend, copy it onto the friends PC and verify file integrity than downloading it.
German internet in a nutshell.
So yeah, IPoAC would've it's purpose.
- For render the first picture of a black hole a couple of uear ago, the data transfer was done through hdds transported by a plane, than a data transfer through Internet, because the former was so much faster.
  https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/289423-it-took-half-a-ton-of-hard-drives-to-store-eht-black-hole-image-data
  
  You are joking. But https://aws.amazon.com/snowmobile/ is real.
- German internet in a nutshell.
  At least you got better healthcare.
- IPoAC is a joke about printing actual IP packets, sending them by pigeon, then scanning them.
  You do the whole usual TCP ACK/SYN thing, but with pigeons.
  It's not the same as 'sneakernet, but strapping microsd cards to a pigeon'. It's way, way sillier.
  
  You know, explaining jokes doesn't make them funnier.
- I bet he had ADSL
  
  50 MBit/s VDSL.
- I'm assuming English isn't your first language, but "IPoAC would've it's purpose" is grammatically awkward. "Would've" doesn't really work for possession. Instead you can use "would have," but people would typically say "IPoAC has it's purpose"
  
  Thanks for the clarification. You're right, English isn't my first language.
  I'm a bit confused by your sentence:
  ""Would've" me doesn't really work fur possession. Instead you can use "would have""
  That's the same thing, isn't it? My idea with using "would've" was that IPoAC would have it's purpose, if it was a thing. I'm missing the descriptive word in either language right now.

But also super high throughput.

The protocol is highly susceptible to DOS attacks by means of BB guns, slingshots or, for more sophisticated hackers, trained hawks.
- "Unintentional encapsulation in hawks has been known to occur, with decapsulation being messy and the packets mangled."
- more sophisticated hawkers, if you will
- Or more sophisticated hawks

Some guys actually managed to do a ping using this standard. I saw pictures and all.
- And apparently it was better than the local internet provider

"an example of packet loss" 🤣
- Yes, we also saw the same post you did.

Ahh, the good old RFCs dated April, 1st. This one is number 1149 ( A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers), and got later updated in RFC 2549 (IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service).

Please note that IPoAC may suffer fatal device failure when delivering HTTP 418 error codes due to packet overheating.

Old news, it's been superseded by RFC6214.
- “ There is evidence that some carriers have a propensity to eat other carriers and then carry the eaten payloads.”
  This is gold

So Alfred Hitchcock predicted DDOS attacks decades before they were a thing?
- I.....

You need to set a pretty damn high timeout time for this to work.
- That said, the bandwidth of strapping microSD cards to carrier pigeons is actually pretty high.

Can a pigeon deliver my data faster than the Internet?

I only torrent over IPoAC.

Imagine playing a shooter over a network using this protocol.
- FPS by mail
  
  Of course there is an xkcd (or rather what if on it)

Routing information protocol, little pigeon, routing information protocol.

My neighbor bought a bird feeder, how do I defend against MitM?
- Buy better seed and a bird bath.

Reminds be of the conversations about transferring hard drives using the public transport system in my city. Good bandwidth, terrible latency. Then everyone got faster internet and stopped pirating
- "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway." – Andrew Tanenbaum
  
  My dad had tapes, but I never got to see data go from a tape to ram. They had 8 GB of space, I remember

Government drone birds can handle surprisingly large amounts of data.

So it's obviously not a sneakernet. Is it a wingnet?

The irony of wind powered Internet.