First thing I said! Amy is the singer, the professor is the priest, and obviously either zoidberg or Hermes is ruby. Then bender should be gary oldmans character
The Professor would be better cast as the guy Ruby Rod says is stone cold deaf, and who eventually rolls a billiards ball back to Bruce Willis's character (I'm drawing a blank on names this morning).
If anything, Bender would make a better Ruby Rod and could cast Roberto as the flaming bad guy entity.
Hermes would make a good Zorg.
Alrighty, I'm thinking way too much into this. ๐ I'm stopping now.
This could have been a fun mashup but this execution just feels kinda wrong/gross overall to me.
Why are so many main characters not included (Hermes, Zoidberg, Nibbler etc.)? At least Bender is present as the flaming mass we all fondly remember from the film...
Was it really necessary to include perky nipples and a camel-toe on Amy?
The staff Professor Rhod is holding has what resembles a golden swastika in the only significant change from how it appears in the movie. And though the Professor is occasionally shown without teeth in the show is there a reason he doesn't have any here?
Why does that train have eyes?
Just a bizarre composition in general. Why include so much of the stone and vents around Amy, then make the openings between the slats just reveal the background image? If Leela was shifted over slightly left her fading tendrils and feet could have been cleanly hidden behind the Professor.
Fry makes no sense as Corbin Dallas, he has completely the wrong energy for that character. The character with the closest energy to Corbin Dallas would be Scruffy, but obviously we can't make Scruffy the main character, so maybe it's Bender instead.
@SatansMaggotyCumFart
Both lol, but the drawing is fine, it correctly shows how Leela is in the movie in the beginning!
We just are not used to see other characters in the same outfit!