2y ago

AWS: IPv4 addresses cost too much, so you’re going to pay

www.theregister.com

AWS to charge customers for public IPv4 addresses from 2024

Cloud giant AWS will start charging customers for public IPv4 addresses from next year, claiming it is forced to do this because of the increasing scarcity of these and to encourage the use of IPv6 instead.

The update will come into effect on February 1, 2024, when AWS customers will see a charge of $0.005 (half a cent) per IP address per hour for all public IPv4 addresses. ... These charges will apply to all AWS services including EC2, Relational Database Service (RDS) database instances, Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) nodes, and will apply across all AWS regions, the company said.

Service Clouds: AWS, Azure, GCP, etc. @lemmy.ca

lxpw @lemmy.ca

2y ago

AWS will charge for public IPv4 addresses soon

www.theregister.com /2023/07/31/aws_says_ipv4_addresses_cost/

TechNews @radiation.party

irradiated @radiation.party

BOT

2y ago

AWS: IPv4 addresses cost too much, so you’re going to pay

www.theregister.com /2023/07/31/aws_says_ipv4_addresses_cost/

55 comments

Hopefully this will push IPv6 adoption further. It is a clusterfuck how long IPv6 exists and how often one has to still fall back to IPv4.
- It really is well past time to start viewing support of IPv4 as a type of "technical debt."
  AWS is just finally putting a price on the cost of that technical debt.
- This is my thought. It's about time greater adoption of IPv6 happens. As much as I don't like corporations getting greedier, in this case however, Amazon is doing us a favor by spurring IPv6 adoption on.
  
  IPv6 is already relatively widespread in the USA (and many other countries) on the client-side, especially on mobile networks.
  T-Mobile's network is almost entirely IPv6-only, using 464XLAT for connectivity to legacy IPv4-only servers.
  The majority of traffic to Facebook (around 62%) is via IPv6. https://www.facebook.com/ipv6
  As of June 2022, 73% of Comcast and 72% of AT&T customers had IPv6 connectivity. https://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/
  People that play online games often try to use IPv6 to avoid NAT, as it reduces latency.
  The main issue is that a lot of sites aren't available over IPv6. Hopefully Amazon helps push that along.
  
  I suspect greed is involved. But since the new allocation of ipv4 hasn't been possible for quite some time in US and Europe. I think the price of those IPs that are assigned to providers is going to gradually rise.
  And to think, I remember when I got a business ISDN account for my old office. They pretty much just gave you a free (well included in the price) /24 without even asking.
  Different times.
- Especially bad for GitHub, which hosts so much software that is really useful on servers. E.g. NixOS has its complete repository there.
I'm going on professional year 24 of clients requiring that IPv6 be deactivated on every device in their network. Whee.
- My current ISP still does not offer IPv6 🤦 🤦 🤦
  
  Verizon, my ISP, offers IPv6 in my area but the implementation is broken and it ends up being an order of magnitude slower than simply using IPv4 and HE as an IPv6 tunnel broker.
- Yeah, my company totally blocks ipv6 when the VPN is on. Not sure why they're so backward for a tech company.
- What's their rationale? Is there one?
  
  Their network admins are old and don't want to learn new stuff, or their networking equipment is old and they don't want to replace it.
  
  "Compliance with regulations."
- The same goes for my place of work. It's going to be shit loads of fun when we are forcibly transitioned. I hope before that time I will be doing web development work and kissing my professional career in infrastructure good bye.
- Is there really any problem with that on the internal though?
Thank goodness. Death to IPv4.
About 3.70/month. Not great, not terrible
- Other providers will start charging more, the US and Europe have ALL ipv4 allocated now. So, yes the cost of a scarce resource goes... Up
  Most of the big websites are on ipv6. Twitter isn't (but is that anyone's loss?). I think the only way we can all make sure the stragglers move to ipv6 is if we all leave an ISP that doesn't offer it.
  After all these years it really should be the dominant stack.
  
  It will add tens of dollars to enterprise infrastructure costs!
  
  Yeah. I pay like 3.50 for my lightsail instance that I host my pihole on. Are they really going to double that for my public ipv4?
  
  which package are you on? i've been wanting something like that
- But that’s as high as the meter…..
"We want more money so fuck you"
- That’s not the Amazon approach. Amazon tries to make money on the volume, not on the margins.
  IPv4 is starting to actually cost. To everyone.
My ISP is still incapable of resolving IPv6 addresses at all. Same goes for several other ISPs in my country that I have tried before that. As of now I need to rent a separate VPS just to have my home server be visible online on a public IPv4 address, and that is with a heavy bandwidth penalization. Can't wait for IPv6 to be generally available in my country at least!
- Well, that's where my scenario dies - I'm behind CGNAT (not even a dynamic IP with direct access to the Internet), and the only providers that do have a fixed IP available only provide the service to commercial clients - which is to say, I'm expected to pay hundreds of dollars a month for the privilege. Guess I'll keep needing a VPS for the time being!
If my ISP doesn't support IPv6, would I need a proxy or something to access an AWS instance with only an IPv6 address?
- A tunnel. I've used these before https://tunnelbroker.net/ and https://www.sixxs.net/main/ probably 10 years ago now. They were pretty good. But of course you need something to act as a router on your network for it to set it up for the whole network. A raspberry pi would be enough or anything running linux. Of course you can probably just set it up on one machine too. I've never done that though.
- You could use an IPv6 tunnel broker service. I know Hurricane Electric offers a service free of charge. I use it and it's not bad. Hurricane Electric also has an IPv6 tutorial. See (https://www.he.net)
  
  I've tried using Hurricane Electric's tunnels on pfsense but it just kills my internet connection and the only solution is to reboot
If they reduced the cost of their internet gateways, I wouldn't use more than 1 IP.. I feel their own pricing leads people to use more IPs than they need.
Good.
Can anyone explain why migration to IPv6 has been so slow? Just too cheap/lazy to migrate or does it break things or what?
- There's a lot of layers of equipment and software that all have to support it, and some companies just aren't willing to replace it all. I'm sure it's exacerbated by how much harder some old code is to work with, because we didn't have the same body of documentation and design concepts that we have today (yes, companies still skimp now, but a lot has changed.
  At this point those are all excuses, though. You should have migrated by now.

55 comments