NAACP calls for emergency shutdown of Musk's supercomputer in Memphis
NAACP calls for emergency shutdown of Musk's supercomputer in Memphis
www.nbcnews.com
NAACP calls for emergency shutdown of Musk's supercomputer in Memphis
6 comments
-
From what I’ve heard about the power situation, they’ve been using mobile generators that they occasionally move around, since those are not regulated. It makes sense to not regulate emergency back up generators since the point of them is that they’re supposed to be temporary and not run for very long, but these aren’t emergency backups, these are the main power source.
Now they’re pushing for permits for permanent generators, probably because the mobile generators are inefficient and expensive.
Honestly the whole situation stinks of incompetence, like they built the facility in a rush without checking if they could get the power they would need, and then tried to build their own power, but saw how hard permitting would be, so they went with the loophole mobile generators because it was expedient, now they want to build proper generators because the mobile generators are too expensive, but are running in to having to face public scrutiny now.
-
Texas is about to pass a bill that requires cities to issue permits for bacakup generators with zero review and bans inspections of the installation.
If the applicant says it meets requirements, we'll be required to issue a permit within 2 days, even if we know 100% that it isn't a safe installation.
It's worse than banning cities from regulating them. It requires cities to officially approve their installation, so the contractor's installing them with zero regard for safety of the residents, the public, or the power grid will.be able to absolve themselves of liability by saying that the installation was appriloved by the city.
A lot of people are going to die.
-
Yah, installing a fixed on-sight back up should be permitted and regulated. And I think they are in the jurisdiction of the facility, hence why they’re using mobile generators, the kinds of things normally used on construction sights.
I was referring more to like emission regulations on them. Dumping a bunch of particulates and exhaust products in to a local population’s air is really bad, but it’s not a huge issue if it’s temporary, like say on a construction sight or to deal with an occasional power outage. It’s another thing entirely when it’s the primary power source, or the power grid is failing so frequently that they’re being run all the time.
That situation in Texas sounds very much like them trying to do something to address public concerns about the grid failing by making it easier for people to “take personal responsibility” by installing backup generators. Clearly they do not want to annoy the private companies running the grid by forcing them to spend money on repairs, upgrades, and maintenance. Like, they’re unwilling to address the core issue, but public outcry means they have to do something, so instead they create a new safety issue that they can deny responsibility for.
-
-
so … standard capitalist formula and response. no surprise, really.
-
Power for AI data centers is very difficult to arrange - and impossible to do in a short time frame.
https://qz.com/ai-data-centers-microsoft-amazon-electric-grid-land-1851782495
I agree with your assessment.
-
-
Why are people SO UPSET? He's just giving Innocent Americans CANCER! Who CARES?
-Pro Life Patriots!
6 comments