What less popular text editors do you like or should have a shout out more often? What stuff do you do with it?
What less popular text editors do you like or should have a shout out more often? What stuff do you do with it?
What less popular text editors do you like or should have a shout out more often? What stuff do you do with it?
You're viewing a single thread.
I'll give you six that I haven't seen mentioned yet:
sim
and vis
, both of which focus on combining vim
motions with structural regular expressions as used in... sam
and acme
from Plan 9, both of which are included in Plan 9 from User Space (aka plan9port
). sam
also has a modified/expanded version in the form of deadpixi/sam
, while acme
has spin-offs like a port to Go and a standalone version. mg
, one of the three default text editors included with OpenBSD (the others being vi
and ed
). sandy
, the abandoned suckless text editor. It uses dmenu
and is fun to mess with for shits and giggles. I am trying to help with vis and it is a lot of fun to use. Aside from things where I really need neovim (because of large plugins), I use vis every day. Sam and ACME (and whole Plan9 for that matter) have the biggest problem with being too GUI oriented. They are from times when we discovered a mouse and then decided we need to use it for everything. Thirty years down the line we know better: we don’t.
I think you mean st instead of dmenu here
...no, I definitely meant dmenu
. sandy
has keybindings that bring up (by default) various dmenu
prompts as a substitute for the usual "command mode".
:
or M-x
to bring up a command prompt, C-\
for a "pipe to" prompt, M-\
for a sed
prompt... you get the idea.
st
is just the suckless terminal emulator; sandy
can be run from any terminal emulator.