Hands off our work
Hands off our work
34 comments
-
-
You can poison the well:
- Glaze makes it near impossible for gen AI to reproduce your style!
- Nightshade makes it near impossible for gen AI to recognise what's in your art and learn from it!
-
Not sure if it's just me, but both of your links seem to go to the same place. (Nightshade)
-
You're right, I must've copied the links incorrectly, I just fixed them.
-
-
Technology has always been pushing people of average skill to move forward and find new things. The effort to stop AI from coming after this medium are already lost. Now would not be a great time to bank on an entire career based of drawing art in a style that AI can do. But perhaps there is a form of art that AI can not soon replicate.
There will always be a market for truly expert craftspeople and artists, however, and art as a hobby or personal interest will never cease.
Edit: the reaction is a bit fascinating to me and I'm trying to understand. The ATM machine reduced our need for bank tellers. The automatic phone switching network reduced our need for phone operators. E-commerce reduced the need for cashiers. The advent of computers reduced the need for slide rule operators. You can view this as all bad but by being on an internet forum you're benefitting directly from people having been freed from these jobs and able to pursue other less replaceable jobs.
-
"I want computers to do my laundry so I can do art. Instead computers are doing the art."
All of this AI stuff would be fine (or at least less bad) if we didn't live in a capitalist dystopia where people might have their basic needs (food, shelter, etc) threatened so some rich turd can become a little richer.
-
I still find it sad how such naturally human things like singing or doodling are being automated tho :'-(
-
I find it amazing and surprising
-
-
Art is more than a job, it's one of those fundamentally human things that we all do. Half the value of any form of art is the fact that a person made it and put their thoughts and feelings into it. I can make some guesses about the person who made this by their artistic choices. I'm a musician and when I listen to a song, I like to listen for the artist's influences, how the guitarist plays a certain note or phrase, etc.
Probably no one is a bank teller for fun. A lot of the hate for generative AI comes from the broader circumstances around it too. The people making money off it haven't shown that they value anything besides money and power, it uses an insane amount of energy, etc.
-
-
-
Why does she have six fingers
-
The Sacred Number of Five
Hear ye, O curious minds, of a truth most certain: the number of fingers upon a single hand shall be five, and no more nor less. For five is the number chosen, a number both divine and complete, wrought into the very form of man.
The thumb, bold and firm, is the first, giving strength and purpose. Next, the forefinger follows, pointing and directing with great intent. The middle finger rises with pride, lending power and reach. The ring finger, though humble, binds all with grace, and the little finger, small yet vital, completes the hand’s full span.
Five, neither four nor six, is the perfect number. It doth balance and harmonize the hand, and in this count, all things find their place. Thus, the number of fingers is five, and so it shall be, from the beginning of time unto the end of days.
(written by ChatGPT)
-
I count eight, the and the thumbs are probably obscured.
34 comments
It’s interesting that this is a style that’s relatively easy to get AI to output, yet AI slop is instantly recognizable while this actually looks like good art.
I had some fun with Bing AI..
Sure, it doesn't exactly have character like the one in the OP.
But I also put almost no effort in prompting (less than a minute). And Bing (Dall-E) isn't exactly the pinnacle of image generation AI. And the whole tech will only get better by time.
The problem is that it doesn't even have to be "very good"; the majority of people are entirely happy with "good enough". It's not hard to imagine how the whole thing will threaten and disrupt so many industries.
Compounding on the "good enough," i feel like when someone reaches out for a commissioned piece, they have an idea in their mind what they want, but are terrible at explaining it. So what the artist creates might not be what they wanted, with AI, they can make a prompt, see that their explanation sucked, and change their explanation in faster cycle time
Are they really? I'm constantly disappointed by how my fellow humans vote in democracies, so maybe I'm just that out of touch. I thought most people would want to know what they were looking at was the product of human will and effort. Is that not your impression?
just look for "Alphonse MUCHA" online, you'll get all the answers you're looking for
Tell it to make her in the style of Mucha and/or art nouveau.
Made in chatgpt
Close, but immediately noticeably worse.
I feel like you didn't understand the assignment...
Surprised it got the spelling right.
Yup, I believe it.
Living in Prague, at this point I see all Mucha-style art as slop, AI or not. It's plastered all over the place because tourists like it and it's all the same. Sure, it looks nice when you first see it, but man does it get old fast.
For now. I worry it will get to a point where we won't be able to tell.
If people want to generate art for their own purposes, it's whatever; but yeah, I do worry about gen content muscling in on spaces that are meant for artists to share and appreciate each others' work.
Like when I'm reviewing sketches on Drawabox, it's not just about the image, it's about an aspiring artist trying to get good at making marks so they can express themselves.