Skip Navigation
147 comments
  • Do these people even read their own books?

    No. I thought that was pretty obvious.

  • Also, remind me Jack, whose side was God on in that fight? Because if I remember correctly it might have not been Goliath's...

  • Bitch, the "unfair treatment" you are going on about was the one proposed by Trump in 2018.

  • The US has strategically used tariffs with great success over the last decades to get favorable pricing from Canada on everything from energy, softwood, potash, you name it. One item at a time, slowly, methodically they were able to bring down pricing. We have been giving the US extremely good prices, and now, because of Trump he has just flipped the board over and it's time to restart.

    America will be far worse off than before this started, and this has leveled off the playing field again with Canada.

    As a Canadian I am thrilled.

    • Could you or someone explain this a bit further? You're saying tariffs were used to bring down prices, but now tariffs are bringing prices back up again? What's different this time?

      Thanks for any help.

      (I'm also thrilled for Canada, especially if it means shit in Donald lap.)

      • I think strategically used tariffs (i.e. used in trade negotiations for specific sectors or items, not unilateral tariffs) can convince a country to export items at a price that benefits one country more than the other, usually in tandem with an agreement to reciprocate. Basically, countries agree to trade at certain rates or exclusively sell. Tariffs are the “bad cop” of trade negotiations.

        The tariff isn’t what lowers the price, it’s the threat of the tariff that lowers the price or keeps it stable.

        Imagine Canada exports maple widgets at $10 a piece to reflect the true cost of manufacture. The US says that is too high, our people can’t afford that price once it’s on the shelves, so how about you export them for $8? To sweeten the deal, we’ll export freedom widgets to you at reduced cost.

        Canada responds saying $8 for maple widgets is too low, $10 is firm and we’ll deal with the current cost of freedom widgets. The US threatens a targeted tariff on maple widgets at 25% which doesn’t affect the price of maple widgets in Canada or their sale price to importers in the US, but importers in the US have to pay $2.50 in tax on top of the purchase cost for maple widgets which drives up the cost for US consumers.

        This results in the price of the item increasing in the US $4.50 over the price determined to be “affordable” which will result in reduced imports and reduced purchases of maple widgets by consumers. Canada now has to find somewhere else to sell their maple widgets since the US isn’t buying at the same rate which drives down the value of maple widgets in Canada.

        And if the US was feeling particularly vengeful at being denied their cheap steady supply of maple widgets, they could convince other countries to not buy Canadian widgets at all or impose a blanket ban on all Canadian goods (see: how the US obliterated the economy of Cuba because of “communism” which was really just Cuba not wanting to be the US’s sugar plantation anymore).

        Canada will evaluate this and determine that selling maple widgets is essential to their economy and less profit for their maple widget industry is an agreeable trade compared to the US not buying at all.

  • Americans & intelligent are 2 things that should never be used together;

    <br>

    I realized that & accepted it

  • Setting tariffs without accompanying trade negotiations is like starting a fight with someone by shooting yourself, unless of course the goal is xenophobia and isolationism instead of equitable trade.

  • If they read it, they would call the main character in part II "woke" and dismiss him as a "liberal."

    And he wasn't even especially woke.

  • not reading the bible is kind of essential to participate in this american prosperity gospel anti-poor pro-money religious bullshit.

  • The philistine's were the antagonist in the story.

  • Love hypocrisy dunking on Christians, but why do we care if Jack Miladin is a bad Christian and doesn't read his Bible, I mean - is he a person of note, a public official, a politician? I can't find anything on this guy, it seems like he's just a rando.

147 comments