1mo ago

To railroad or not to railroad?

User Monomyth posed an interesting question on the Traveller discord that I wanted to replicate here:

hi team, just a quick discussion based question with no right answer; if youre running a game, and the players decide to veer off course into something completely out of left field (such as going to a planet you do not have prepped), is it appropriate to come up with some "delaying issue" so you can have it ready for next session?

Transposing to other settings: what do you do when the players go off-script?

I can summarize some answers we’ve got on that server, but I don’t want to prime your answers from the start.

6 comments

I got sidetracked for a while, but here are some answers from that chat:
Ideally you just swap planets. Whatever you have set up for them on planet one is now surprise on planet two.
[in response to the above] This is the default solution for story focused games. The story continues to the next act, the players dictate how.
“I hadn’t thought of that! I don’t have anything prepared. Why don’t we just pause things here for now and chat. I’ll have it ready next time.”
I guess the question is how far off the path? Jump 1 away or Jump 6? GM completely unprepared? Or not as prepared as you’d like? As a Traveller GM I’ve got
The notes for every planet and system within range of the PCs ship x2. I.e. for J2 every system within 4 parsecs.
A list of 100+ random NPC names
A couple sentences about each system
Same for the two to five largest factions in my setting
So if the PCs wander I’ve usually got enough material for one night’s worth of material
An easy delay is simply to go into more detail. For example, have them go through the steps of Customs at the new starport, or notice something interesting about another ship, etc. It adds texture to the game, is interesting, and gives you the extra time to prep.
For my group (not sure if it will work for every group) i just leveraged their completionist mindsets. I told them "here are 15 jobs" and the first thing they did was plot an exact course to hit all of them, so they prevented themselves from wandering.
The last one is my favorite of this bunch, because as a player I'd fall for that hook, line, and sinker.
Thank you everyone for participating!

If the players want to do something I don't feel ready to do (either because it's not prepped or I don't feel up to winging it), I'll tell them.
"That's cool you want to go to so-and-so, but I haven't given it any thought. We can end early, or I can try to improv it with no quality guarantee"
There are some kinds of planning I don't do, like making specific maps and stat blocks, so some kinds of "going off script" don't hinder me much.
Sometimes I'll ask the players for input. "Ok, what sort of rites happen at this midnight ritual [that we just made up] that you decided to crash?". I don't really like the player mode where they just want to sit back and be told a story, nor do I much like the mode where they're super zoomed in on their character without engaging with any other level. I've had players like that, where they want to really immerse in their character and feel like answering setting details takes them out of it, but that's not really how I like it.

A bit of preface. The games I run, the games I play in and the groups I enjoy all are very open with discussing meta. From story beats to encounter critiques and where we the players want to see the game go.
what do you do when the players go off-script?
We are honest and appreciate the time the GMs put into running the games. Several times either I or another GM have stated "that direction is not prepared" and the group have a chat from there. Perhaps calling it early or we zoom in on character daily life (or their projects). The amount of times a "forgotten" villain have reappeared for revenge in these situation is kinda high.
on railroading
Why play a game about characters, their decisions and their reaction to adversary when their decisions won't matter? When the roads they travel all lead to Rome? This is very much also something that is part of the game's setup. How directed the game will be. A wide open sandbox will strain much more against being directed than a more tightly focused narrative. Heck, I don't actually mind being directed in a game with a focused narrative or having the GM drawing the game back to it's story.
It's a complex topic where advice will differ depending on the specifics of each game.

Traveller Discord?
As the others have said, I just straight talk with my players. I don't mind if they take a different direction and I honestly enjoy when they take the initiative to do what they want. I don't try to force them back onto the railroad track, but I will save bits of whatever they would have encountered for later (especially if I've already prepped it!).
If, however, they are taking that exit because I gave them the wrong directions, I will try to get them back on track. I don't consider this railroading, but nudging them in a direction. My players are willing participants in the adventure, but they don't always pick up subtle clues. If they need some more-obvious direction, I try my best to do that without taking away their freedom of choice.
- Traveller Discord?
  Yeah. There's a very active Discord server for Traveller and all it's variants:
  https://discord.gg/xMvmatKh

I'll reiterate what others have said: If I don't have anything prepared and don't feel like I can wing it, I'll just tell the players what's up. We're all here to collaborate and have a good time, so that conversation is a part of it. Maybe we get back to it after a short break, maybe the next session.
As for railroading or not in a broad sense, it depends. Both can be a ton of fun. The important part is just that everyone's on the same page: a DM who wants to run a railroad and players who will go along with the plot; or the DM wants to run a sandbox and the players want to forge their own path. I like both, so it's just a matter of clear communication.
On a tangent, I think players taking initiative is generally a good sign. It means the DM is providing hooks (intentionally or not), and the players are being proactive and invested.

6 comments