The absolute Noncredibility of North Korean anti-drone tactics.
The absolute Noncredibility of North Korean anti-drone tactics.
The absolute Noncredibility of North Korean anti-drone tactics.
If Lightning cant strike the same place twice, then artillery can't either... Right?
The Somme has enetered the chat.
What a slow and ineffective way of taking down a drone. Faster is to just say to it, "Down boy! Heel! Who's a good boy?" and the drone will automatically switch sides
"Woolooloo"
Pspspspspsps
Just grab your robes and start shouting Wololo
Despite looking like a science fiction war crime, that's all these things do.
Pyongyang's anti-drone tactics manuals:
Actual question, what's the credible advice if your small group is caught in the open by a drone?
Obviously "don't be" or "have EW coverage of your operational zone". But beyond that what is the prevailing wisdom western soldiers are taught assuming countermeasures don't work and you have to risk exposure?
Drop your pants and expose your anus in a sign of submission.
Perhaps there's another way
The amount of videos of russian soldiers being blown up with their pants down proves you wrong
Send a bigger drone with a net on it to catch the smaller drone.
A kite
Nice try, Shoigu!
Shoot it. Repeatedly.
I don't know what actual doctrine is right now.
I'd suggest that it should include something like:
A bigger complication is how to deal with combined arms threats, like a drone and being under fire from small arms. As with other combined arms threats, the counters to one to some degree are going to conflict with those to another.
Also, some of these tactics and counter-tactics are going to evolve. Like, this might work well against a lone FPV drone. But what if that drone just lands and goes into a lower-power mode, keeping the squad pinned until more FPV drones can show up? I don't know how coordinated drone operators are on each side...yet. But if coordination will help, it's a good bet that it will eventually be used.