SF ads call out tech firms for not paying for open source
SF ads call out tech firms for not paying for open source
www.theregister.com
SF ads call out tech firms for not paying for open source
22 comments
-
-
Maybe the software license should have been one that only allows non commercial use or the open sourcing of all derivative code.
-
This is hard though. You present commercial license, and you'll cut out a good 80-90% of the potential users, which means the OSS project is way more likely to die.
I think CTOs should be okay with allowing their employees to contribute to projects they use. In my first hand experience, they're more likely to say "no we shouldn't". It's unfair really.
-
This is the same argument as "capital flight". It's a bad one as most opensource isn't used commercially. There are thousands of projects maybe millions of projects out there not found anywhere in commercial projects. Most aren't written to end up being used commercially either, but if they ever are, they should get paid.
Arguing against adding a line to get paid in case it's used commercially, is as bad an argument as taxing the rich "because one day I might be rich".
-
-
-
I guess it's time to push for more AGPL
-
-
-
makes thing for free
Doesn't get paid for it
Why not make a license that makes it free if you contribute to development and paid for if you don't?
-
Because for those using it non commercially it would be prohibitively expensive.
-
-
I hope this Doesn't catch on. It is open for a reason. Damn drama makers.
-
You hope the idea that "commerical companies that have profited off of FOSS feel compelled and pledge to contribute to the maintainence and development of those projects" doesn't catch on?
Why?
-
22 comments
The parasite class didn't get rich by paying people what they're worth, and I doubt they're going to start now
https://youtu.be/H27rfr59RiE?si=TMO6D1ADVf-1ZNlf
I don't think you can blame them for this. How many resources do you use without voluntarily paying extra above your legal requirements? Do you donate every time you go to free libraries, museums, parks, cathedrals, etc? I certainly don't and I don't think that makes me "the parasite class".
Free libraries, museums, parks are paid for by taxes. So yes, you do pay for them. I've been in a bunch of cathedrals that charged for entry, yes.