You're viewing a single thread.
Ah yes, male emotions are "fragile masculinity"
When your emotions are reduced to 'rage' and your reactions reduced to 'commit violence against inanimate objects in a public setting', yes.
You have no idea what prompted the emotions, you just happily assume whatever will give you the excuse to express your misandry.
I'd bet anything that if you read one of the many accounts of women getting genuinely angry at their SOs, even striking them (which is way worse than striking an inanimate object, by the way), based on what they dreamt the guy did, you wouldn't be blaming her "fragile femininity".
You have no idea what prompted the emotions, you just happily assume whatever will give you the excuse to express your misandry.
I’d bet anything that if you read one of the many accounts of women getting genuinely angry at their SOs, even striking them (which is way worse than striking an inanimate object, by the way), based on what they dreamt the guy did, you wouldn’t be blaming her “fragile femininity”.
Really just immediately do what you accused me of doing, huh.
Sucks don't it?
It suggests that the objection is not made in good faith or on principle, even if one accepted the original accusation as true. "Our True Faith vs. Their Heathen Superstition" energy, lmao.
If your emotions leads you to punching things / breaking public property, that's pretty damn fragile masculinity.