Skip Navigation

Suggestions for best course of action to convince parents that cutting the cord is going to save them quite a bit of money and they can still watch all their programs?

I’m clearly doing it wrong because they just don’t seem to believe that they won’t be missing out on their regular programs, many of which they can also access on apps they already have. But they would rather keep watching DirecTV for $120 a month. I’m worn out

27 comments
  • If your parents are struggling to make ends meet at 77 then continue pressing the point and let them know why.

    If they’re not let to go.

    You’re good with tech and know they can save some money. If they don’t care about tech, and aren’t hurting for money, you’re just being annoying.

    Had the same convo with my mom. That’s where the annoying line came from! She likes what she has and can afford it.

    Now my sister ima boot in the head because she cancelled my mom’s landline for a cheaper cell plan. So now, oh…about 80% of the time I try to call mom her phone rings right into voicemail because she forgot to plug it in!

  • Why do you care what they use? You are factually correct, but everyone knows that end user experience trumps all, and familiarity is a huge factor in that.

    Let Meemaw have her picture box the way she likes it.

  • If they have to have a lot of channels then $120 isn't the worst price (I have relatives who pay twice as much as that a month for cable) though you could perhaps try and check into whether they could switch to a streaming linear TV service like DirecTV Stream with one of their lower tier packages to save some money while retaining a cable-like experience (there's also Sling, Hulu+Live TV, YoutubeTV, FUBO, etc, many of which have packages with many of the top channels for $60-$80/month).

    Fact is to save money you need to be willing to give things up. If you're moving from a premium cable package with a ton of channels to a few streaming services you're going to lose things and potentially a lot of things. You're going to lose access to live news channels, you're going to lose access to specific programs on some networks that don't have streaming service equivalents (I know for one older person I knew the fact they couldn't get and watch Lifetime and Hallmark movies within any reasonable time-frame of their premier meant they were not interested in looking into streaming any further to replace their cable).

    More than that though most old people hate change, they were used to a certain way of things and they're afraid and perhaps get confused or frustrated with this new way of doing things. It's simply more comfortable for them to use the old satellite system they're used to and its interface and way of changing channels than doing something new where they have to think of how to do something or get frustrated or ask for help. Which is why I do think trying a streaming cable replacement like those I mentioned might be your best bet. It would still save some money.

  • For my grandfather... The issue wasn't the shows, but he specifically wants a few news programs and will not under any circumstances go without them.

    This was a problem for even going to Internet based streaming options because he just will not accept anything without those shows for more than a few months.

    Meanwhile he also complains he doesn't have enough to watch and says he can't afford it (he can, he just doesn't like what it cost)... But those dang news channels... and just his outlook on TV in general.

27 comments