Skip Navigation

(CW FOOD) Chicken wings advertised as 'boneless' can have bones, Ohio Supreme Court decides

89 comments
  • boneless wings aren't even made from the fuckin wings for fucks sake i'm so fucking angry

    • The second stage is perversion of reality, where people come to believe that the sign is an unfaithful copy, which "masks and denatures" reality as an "evil appearance—it is of the order of maleficence". Here, signs and images do not faithfully reveal reality to us, but can hint at the existence of an obscure reality which the sign itself is incapable of encapsulating.

  • doesn't this set a precedent to destroy basically all false advertising rules ever? your nut-free products can now contain nuts, because fuck you. your meatless cookies can contain cats. your arsenic-free soda can give you arsenic poisoning, fuck it. i don't know anything about the usamerikkan legal system, but how can this possibly hold up?

  • I agree with this ruling. Just because it says boneless doesn't mean there may not be bones or bone fragments. It's just the risk of being a dipshit eating wings at a bar.

    • maybe go live in ohio then

      • Maybe, just maybe, when your eating a mechanically separated hunk of tortured dead animal and a random piece of bone is present and it cuts your esophagus you should reflect on your food choice. Rather than trying to sue over what is an obvious random occurrence that is inevitable when eating a disturbing 'natural' factory made food product.

        Or just die so the 5-12 animals who's remains you just thoughtlessly horked down your treat hole may rest in a bit of peace.

89 comments