You're viewing a single thread.
Permanently Deleted
102 0 ReplyI don't accept your answer. I know deep in my heart that it's 4.
88 1 ReplyI got the same thing on my phone's calculator. Do you think the waterproofing will get in the way when I give it the baptism it clearly needs?
22 0 Reply
That's so ugly, it can't be correct... 4 is much nicer
35 1 ReplyGlad you did though, only opened the comments to see what the actual answer was.
22 0 ReplyYa beat me by seconds. Lemmy is truly blooming lol
21 0 ReplyI got 178,910,723.30891
My answer is superior.
18 0 ReplyWell, 4 wasn't that far off, considering.
17 1 ReplyThere's a 4 in the more accurate answer. That is proof of the divine showing the truth before man could understand the full answer.
12 0 ReplyThis guy apologetics.
6 0 Reply
It was only a couple orders of magnitude off.
7 0 Reply2 is a couple, 9 is more like fewish
7 1 Reply2 is a couple.
What's a few, several, a bunch, a bit, many, a bundle?
4 0 Reply2 is a couple, nine is that pron crew.
2 0 Reply
Do we really want to live in a world where this fraction is the answer? I would like my kids to grow up knowing it's an integer
7 0 ReplyNo thank you! Integer is too close to the devil's word: integration!
2 0 Reply
I saw three different serious-looking answers, so I punched it into a spreadsheet to get my own answer. What I got matches your answer, but with an extra 2 at the end.
4 0 ReplyPermanently Deleted
3 0 Reply
Round down for simplicity. Yes, yes, I can see 4 being the easy answer.
4 0 ReplyThat is too complicated for me to understand, therefore, it is too complicated for everyone to understand. Why would anyone believe something that I can't understand?
3 0 ReplyHeathen! At that scale the digits after the decimal point aren't significant. I'm sure you know that in your heart. Why can't you accept an obvious universal truth?
2 0 ReplyThat is just a theory. You should present both sides. Also a majority of religious scholars say it is 4.
2 0 Reply